PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XJSE.DE vs. EXVM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XJSE.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Japan Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XJSE.DE) and iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 0-1yr UCITS ETF (DE) (EXVM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJSE.DE achieves a -5.80% return, which is significantly lower than EXVM.DE's 0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, XJSE.DE has underperformed EXVM.DE with an annualized return of -7.50%, while EXVM.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 0.29% annualized return.


XJSE.DE

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.34%
6M
-5.19%
YTD
-5.80%
1Y
-15.95%
3Y*
-11.78%
5Y*
-11.28%
10Y*
-7.50%

EXVM.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.21%
6M
0.92%
YTD
0.80%
1Y
1.68%
3Y*
2.62%
5Y*
1.43%
10Y*
0.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJSE.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XJSE.DE
Xtrackers II Japan Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
-5.80%-17.53%-8.95%-9.72%-14.55%-3.16%-4.65%5.55%7.74%-8.68%
EXVM.DE
iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 0-1yr UCITS ETF (DE)
0.80%2.06%3.37%2.36%-1.00%-0.83%-0.79%-0.80%-0.84%-0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between XJSE.DE and EXVM.DE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2013

0.08

The correlation between XJSE.DE and EXVM.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XJSE.DE vs. EXVM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJSE.DE
XJSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
XJSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
XJSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

EXVM.DE
EXVM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
EXVM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXVM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXVM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
EXVM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXVM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJSE.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Japan Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XJSE.DE) and iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 0-1yr UCITS ETF (DE) (EXVM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XJSE.DEEXVM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.73

1.68

-0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

14.22

-15.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.49

54.84

-56.33

XJSE.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJSE.DE Sharpe Ratio is -1.72, which is lower than the EXVM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJSE.DE and EXVM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XJSE.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJSE.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.06%, which is greater than EXVM.DE's maximum drawdown of -6.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJSE.DE and EXVM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XJSE.DEEXVM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.06%

-6.33%

-48.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.50%

-0.12%

-16.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.72%

-0.13%

-32.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.28%

-1.65%

-45.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.06%

-5.65%

-49.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.83%

-0.01%

-54.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.23%

-1.76%

-18.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.02%

0.03%

+9.99%

Volatility

XJSE.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II Japan Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XJSE.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.82% compared to iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 0-1yr UCITS ETF (DE) (EXVM.DE) at 0.12%. This indicates that XJSE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXVM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XJSE.DEEXVM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.82%

0.12%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

0.41%

+6.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.27%

0.54%

+8.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.12%

0.51%

+10.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.92%

0.79%

+9.13%

XJSE.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJSE.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than EXVM.DE's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XJSE.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Dividend Comparison

XJSE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EXVM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXVM.DE
iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 0-1yr UCITS ETF (DE)
1.06%1.14%0.77%0.80%0.61%0.78%0.96%1.10%1.05%1.15%1.51%1.63%
XJSE.DE
Xtrackers II Japan Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XJSE.DE and EXVM.DE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EXVM.DE is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EXVM.DE is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XJSE.DE.

XJSE.DE tracks FTSE Japanese Government Bond Index, while EXVM.DE tracks eb.rexx Government Germany 0-1 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XJSE.DE and 0.13% for EXVM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XJSE.DE and EXVM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer