PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XIU.TO vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XIU.TO vs. XLK

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

XIU.TO (iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XIU.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XIU.TO returned 12.76%/yr vs 26.18%/yr for XLK. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XIU.TO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.

Performance

XIU.TO vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XIU.TO is traded in CAD, while XLK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIU.TO achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 30.38% return. Over the past 10 years, XIU.TO has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 12.76%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 26.18% annualized return.

XIU.TO

1D
0.26%
1M
2.33%
YTD
9.69%
6M
11.69%
1Y
31.18%
3Y*
22.55%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
12.76%

XLK

1D
2.40%
1M
7.07%
YTD
30.38%
6M
26.05%
1Y
58.52%
3Y*
33.20%
5Y*
25.75%
10Y*
26.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIU.TO vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF		9.69%28.89%20.73%11.85%-6.35%28.06%5.27%21.81%-7.82%9.58%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF		30.38%18.92%31.93%52.31%-23.15%34.68%40.21%43.68%6.59%25.17%

Correlation

The correlation between XIU.TO and XLK is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2006

0.51

The correlation between XIU.TO and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

XIU.TO vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XIU.TO
XLK

Financial Services

39.4%

-

Energy

18.6%
0.2%

Basic Materials

13.3%

-

Technology

8.8%
99.7%

Industrials

7.9%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.6%

-

Communication Services

2.0%

-

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Healthcare

-

-

Financial Services

XIU.TO
39.4%
XLK

-

Energy

XIU.TO
18.6%
XLK
0.2%

Basic Materials

XIU.TO
13.3%
XLK

-

Technology

XIU.TO
8.8%
XLK
99.7%

Industrials

XIU.TO
7.9%
XLK
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XIU.TO
4.1%
XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

XIU.TO
3.2%
XLK

-

Utilities

XIU.TO
2.6%
XLK

-

Communication Services

XIU.TO
2.0%
XLK

-

Real Estate

XIU.TO
0.2%
XLK

-

Healthcare

XIU.TO

-

XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

Often compared with XIU.TO:
XIU.TO vs. XIC.TOXIU.TO vs. ZCN.TOXIU.TO vs. XDIV.TOXIU.TO vs. XSP.TOXIU.TO vs. HXT.TOXIU.TO vs. SPYXIU.TO vs. XIT.TO
Often compared with XLK:
XLK vs. QQQXLK vs. VGTXLK vs. SMHXLK vs. SPYXLK vs. FTECXLK vs. IYWXLK vs. XLE

Return for Risk

XIU.TO vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XIU.TO
XIU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIU.TO vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XIU.TOXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.62
2.65

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.49
3.23

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.43

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

3.64

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.93

10.89

+8.04

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XIU.TO vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIU.TO and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XIU.TOXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.65

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

1.00

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

1.03

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.69

-0.14

Drawdowns

XIU.TO vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIU.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.98%, which is greater than XLK's maximum drawdown of -38.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIU.TO and XLK.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XIU.TOXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.98%

-38.68%

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.65%

-16.16%

+8.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.36%

-26.35%

+13.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

-29.64%

+13.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.46%

-29.64%

-5.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-6.41%

+4.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-7.57%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

5.39%

-3.74%

Volatility

XIU.TO vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) is 3.96%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.45%. This indicates that XIU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XIU.TOXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

10.45%

-6.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.56%

18.52%

-8.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.97%

22.22%

-10.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.82%

25.83%

-13.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

25.53%

-10.51%

XIU.TO vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIU.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XIU.TO vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

XIU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than XLK's 0.41% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF		2.21%2.39%2.92%3.16%3.02%2.43%3.03%2.87%3.18%2.58%2.65%3.19%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF		0.41%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

XIU.TO and XLK have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XIU.TO.

XIU.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. XIU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XIU.TO and 0.08% for XLK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIU.TO and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer