XIU.TO vs. QTUM
XIU.TO (iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XIU.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XIU.TO returned 14.62%/yr vs 27.44%/yr for QTUM. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XIU.TO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
XIU.TO vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XIU.TO is traded in CAD, while QTUM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTUM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIU.TO achieves a 12.53% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 32.28% return.
XIU.TO
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 8.69%
- YTD
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- 30.19%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 14.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.36%
QTUM
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -16.29%
- 6M
- 20.77%
- YTD
- 32.28%
- 1Y
- 53.22%
- 3Y*
- 44.63%
- 5Y*
- 27.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.72%
XIU.TO vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIU.TO iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 12.53% | 28.89% | 20.73% | 11.85% | -6.35% | 28.06% | 5.27% | 21.81% | -9.47% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 32.28% | 30.41% | 63.29% | 36.54% | -24.29% | 35.12% | 38.68% | 41.89% | -16.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIU.TO and QTUM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.60 |
The correlation between XIU.TO and QTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XIU.TO vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XIU.TO
QTUM
Financial Services
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
XIU.TO
QTUM
Energy
XIU.TO
QTUM
-
Basic Materials
XIU.TO
QTUM
-
Technology
XIU.TO
QTUM
Industrials
XIU.TO
QTUM
Consumer Cyclical
XIU.TO
QTUM
Consumer Defensive
XIU.TO
QTUM
-
Utilities
XIU.TO
QTUM
-
Communication Services
XIU.TO
QTUM
Real Estate
XIU.TO
QTUM
-
Healthcare
XIU.TO
-
QTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIU.TO vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
XIU.TO
QTUM
XIU.TO vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XIU.TO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.29 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 3.14 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.11 | 10.89 | +7.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XIU.TO vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIU.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.98%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -33.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIU.TO and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIU.TO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.98% | -33.52% | -13.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.65% | -17.04% | +9.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.36% | -25.61% | +13.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.36% | -33.52% | +17.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -17.04% | +15.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.85% | -7.38% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 4.91% | -3.24% |
Volatility
XIU.TO vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) is 2.16%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 11.10%. This indicates that XIU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIU.TO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.16% | 11.10% | -8.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.60% | 25.66% | -16.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.07% | 30.82% | -18.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.81% | 28.07% | -15.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.99% | 28.22% | -13.23% |
XIU.TO vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIU.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XIU.TO vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
XIU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than QTUM's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.83% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XIU.TO iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 2.15% | 2.39% | 2.92% | 3.16% | 3.02% | 2.43% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 3.18% | 2.58% | 2.65% | 3.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIU.TO and QTUM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XIU.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XIU.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.
XIU.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. XIU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XIU.TO and 0.40% for QTUM.
Find the right allocation for XIU.TO and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer