XIT.TO vs. YGOG.NEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XIT.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF) and YGOG.NEO (Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XIT.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while YGOG.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Purpose. XIT.TO is passively managed, while YGOG.NEO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XIT.TO returned 17.90%/yr vs 45.35%/yr for YGOG.NEO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XIT.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for YGOG.NEO.

Performance

XIT.TO vs. YGOG.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) and Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YGOG.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIT.TO achieves a -4.19% return, which is significantly lower than YGOG.NEO's 10.76% return.

XIT.TO

• 1D: -3.62%
• 1M: 5.49%
• YTD: -4.19%
• 6M: -5.79%
• 1Y: 9.80%
• 3Y*: 17.90%
• 5Y*: 8.31%
• 10Y*: 17.57%

YGOG.NEO

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: -7.79%
• YTD: 10.76%
• 6M: 8.82%
• 1Y: 119.67%
• 3Y*: 45.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIT.TO vs. YGOG.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF	-4.19%	15.48%	30.02%	55.56%	-0.51%
YGOG.NEO Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	10.76%	69.45%	46.37%	56.07%	1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between XIT.TO and YGOG.NEO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2022	0.42

The correlation between XIT.TO and YGOG.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XIT.TO vs. YGOG.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XIT.TO	YGOG.NEO
Technology	99.8%	-
Financial Services	0.8%	-
Industrials	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	100.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XIT.TO vs. YGOG.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIT.TO

XIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 13
XIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
XIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
XIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 13
XIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
XIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 12

YGOG.NEO

YGOG.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 92
YGOG.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
YGOG.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
YGOG.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
YGOG.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
YGOG.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIT.TO vs. YGOG.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) and Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YGOG.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XIT.TO	YGOG.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	3.77	-3.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	4.77	-4.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.61	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.31	5.52	-5.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.62	20.61	-19.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XIT.TO vs. YGOG.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the YGOG.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 3.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIT.TO and YGOG.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XIT.TO	YGOG.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31	3.77	-3.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	1.62	-1.32

Drawdowns

XIT.TO vs. YGOG.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.18%, which is greater than YGOG.NEO's maximum drawdown of -33.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIT.TO and YGOG.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XIT.TO	YGOG.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.18%	-33.45%	-47.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.93%	-21.82%	-10.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.93%	-33.45%	+1.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.47%	-11.86%	-2.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.86%	-7.59%	-19.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.74%	5.83%	+9.91%

Volatility

XIT.TO vs. YGOG.NEO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YGOG.NEO) at 11.10%. This indicates that XIT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YGOG.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XIT.TO	YGOG.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.83%	11.10%	+0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.39%	22.75%	+1.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.36%	32.02%	-0.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.37%	32.94%	-3.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.71%	32.94%	-6.23%

XIT.TO vs. YGOG.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIT.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than YGOG.NEO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

XIT.TO vs. YGOG.NEO - Dividend Comparison

XIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YGOG.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.29%	0.00%	0.13%	0.14%	0.08%
YGOG.NEO Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	8.15%	5.84%	14.19%	7.22%	0.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XIT.TO and YGOG.NEO in my portfolio?

XIT.TO and YGOG.NEO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XIT.TO or YGOG.NEO?

On fees, YGOG.NEO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XIT.TO or YGOG.NEO?

YGOG.NEO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XIT.TO.

What is the main difference between XIT.TO and YGOG.NEO?

XIT.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while YGOG.NEO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Purpose. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XIT.TO and 0.40% for YGOG.NEO.