XISE vs. COMT
XISE (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XISE is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XISE returned 6.80% vs 45.51% for COMT. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. XISE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
XISE vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XISE achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 37.50% return.
XISE
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 3.72%
- 1Y
- 6.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- 37.50%
- 6M
- 36.36%
- 1Y
- 45.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
XISE vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XISE FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September | 3.04% | 6.42% | 5.70% | 3.09% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 37.50% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -10.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between XISE and COMT is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023 | -0.04 |
XISE vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XISE
COMT
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
XISE
COMT
-
Financial Services
XISE
COMT
Communication Services
XISE
COMT
-
Consumer Cyclical
XISE
COMT
-
Healthcare
XISE
COMT
-
Industrials
XISE
COMT
-
Consumer Defensive
XISE
COMT
-
Energy
XISE
COMT
-
Utilities
XISE
COMT
-
Real Estate
XISE
COMT
-
Basic Materials
XISE
COMT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XISE vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
XISE
COMT
XISE vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September (XISE) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XISE | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.38 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 5.70 | -2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.31 | 13.42 | +6.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XISE | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.14 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 0.20 | +1.19 |
Drawdowns
XISE vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XISE drawdown since its inception was -6.17%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XISE and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XISE | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.17% | -51.89% | +45.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.88% | -8.02% | +6.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.30% | +6.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -24.06% | +23.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | 3.40% | -3.06% |
Volatility
XISE vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September (XISE) is 0.37%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that XISE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XISE | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.37% | 7.46% | -7.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 18.88% | -16.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96% | 21.36% | -18.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 21.07% | -16.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 18.89% | -13.97% |
XISE vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XISE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
XISE vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
XISE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than COMT's 5.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.63% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
XISE FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September | 5.92% | 5.81% | 7.04% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XISE and COMT have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.46%) compared to XISE (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XISE dropped -6.17% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 45.51% vs 6.80% for XISE. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, XISE has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 45.51% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XISE.
XISE has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 5.63% for COMT.
XISE is categorized as Options Trading, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XISE and 0.48% for COMT.
XISE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XISE and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer