PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XINC.TO vs. XDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XINC.TO vs. XDIV.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XINC.TO (iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio) and XDIV.TO (iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XINC.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares, while XDIV.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. XINC.TO is actively managed, while XDIV.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XINC.TO returned 3.19%/yr vs 16.63%/yr for XDIV.TO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XINC.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for XDIV.TO.

Performance

XINC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio (XINC.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XINC.TO achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV.TO's 20.26% return.

XINC.TO

1D
0.09%
1M
2.26%
YTD
3.53%
6M
3.10%
1Y
8.23%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
—

XDIV.TO

1D
0.91%
1M
3.66%
YTD
20.26%
6M
19.53%
1Y
40.50%
3Y*
23.53%
5Y*
16.63%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XINC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio		3.53%6.71%7.76%8.51%-11.25%1.27%9.16%1.23%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF		20.26%24.92%19.56%11.71%0.29%32.25%-7.81%10.60%

Correlation

The correlation between XINC.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2019

0.25

XINC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XINC.TO
XDIV.TO

Technology

4.8%
1.3%

Financial Services

4.3%
46.7%

Industrials

1.9%

-

Energy

1.5%
28.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
11.5%

Communication Services

1.3%
0.4%

Basic Materials

1.3%

-

Healthcare

1.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.9%

-

Utilities

0.5%
11.3%

Real Estate

0.3%

-

Technology

XINC.TO
4.8%
XDIV.TO
1.3%

Financial Services

XINC.TO
4.3%
XDIV.TO
46.7%

Industrials

XINC.TO
1.9%
XDIV.TO

-

Energy

XINC.TO
1.5%
XDIV.TO
28.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XINC.TO
1.4%
XDIV.TO
11.5%

Communication Services

XINC.TO
1.3%
XDIV.TO
0.4%

Basic Materials

XINC.TO
1.3%
XDIV.TO

-

Healthcare

XINC.TO
1.2%
XDIV.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

XINC.TO
0.9%
XDIV.TO

-

Utilities

XINC.TO
0.5%
XDIV.TO
11.3%

Real Estate

XINC.TO
0.3%
XDIV.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio

iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF

Often compared with XINC.TO:
XINC.TO vs. XCNS.TOXINC.TO vs. VFV.TOXINC.TO vs. XEQT.TOXINC.TO vs. XGRO.TOXINC.TO vs. XSUS.TOXINC.TO vs. ZMMK.TOXINC.TO vs. XBAL.TO
Often compared with XDIV.TO:
XDIV.TO vs. VDY.TOXDIV.TO vs. XEI.TOXDIV.TO vs. XDV.TOXDIV.TO vs. XEQT.TOXDIV.TO vs. HDIV.TOXDIV.TO vs. XIU.TOXDIV.TO vs. CDZ.TO

Return for Risk

XINC.TO vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XINC.TO
XINC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XINC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XINC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XINC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XINC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XINC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO
XDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XINC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio (XINC.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XINC.TOXDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.68
5.17

-3.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.44
7.63

-5.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

2.09

-0.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

17.45

-15.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.54

59.31

-50.77

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XINC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XINC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XINC.TO and XDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XINC.TOXDIV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

5.17

-3.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

1.59

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.82

-0.26

Drawdowns

XINC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XINC.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.40%, smaller than the maximum XDIV.TO drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XINC.TO and XDIV.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XINC.TOXDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.40%

-41.30%

+25.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-2.33%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.36%

-10.53%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.40%

-17.60%

+2.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-4.25%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.68%

+0.29%

Volatility

XINC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio (XINC.TO) is 1.92%, while iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that XINC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XINC.TOXDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

2.81%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.13%

6.37%

-2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.93%

7.89%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.42%

10.53%

-4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.73%

16.00%

-9.27%

XINC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XINC.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XINC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

XINC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than XDIV.TO's 3.26% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF		3.26%3.81%4.29%4.20%3.95%3.58%4.58%4.02%4.85%1.82%
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio		3.19%3.16%2.81%2.87%2.54%2.02%2.40%0.93%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XINC.TO and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XINC.TO.

XINC.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XINC.TO and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XINC.TO and XDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer