PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XIN.TO vs. XGRO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XIN.TO vs. XGRO.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XIN.TO (iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and XGRO.TO (iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - XIN.TO is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Index, while XGRO.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares. XIN.TO is passively managed, while XGRO.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, XIN.TO returned 12.75%/yr vs 10.20%/yr for XGRO.TO. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XIN.TO charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XGRO.TO.

Performance

XIN.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIN.TO achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly lower than XGRO.TO's 10.38% return. Over the past 10 years, XIN.TO has outperformed XGRO.TO with an annualized return of 12.75%, while XGRO.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.20% annualized return.

XIN.TO

1D
-0.52%
1M
4.48%
YTD
9.11%
6M
10.87%
1Y
21.23%
3Y*
16.54%
5Y*
15.09%
10Y*
12.75%

XGRO.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
5.42%
YTD
10.38%
6M
8.74%
1Y
23.44%
3Y*
17.87%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIN.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XIN.TO
iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		9.11%20.30%14.27%19.36%1.59%25.71%-0.02%24.88%-10.05%16.34%
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio		10.38%15.59%19.53%15.01%-11.08%14.29%11.51%17.97%-6.73%11.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XIN.TO and XGRO.TO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2007

0.62

The correlation between XIN.TO and XGRO.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XIN.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XIN.TO
XGRO.TO

Financial Services

23.3%
20.3%

Industrials

16.6%
7.3%

Technology

10.9%
25.8%

Healthcare

9.5%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
3.8%

Basic Materials

5.7%
5.6%

Communication Services

4.0%
6.8%

Energy

3.3%
7.2%

Utilities

3.1%
1.5%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.4%

Financial Services

XIN.TO
23.3%
XGRO.TO
20.3%

Industrials

XIN.TO
16.6%
XGRO.TO
7.3%

Technology

XIN.TO
10.9%
XGRO.TO
25.8%

Healthcare

XIN.TO
9.5%
XGRO.TO
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XIN.TO
7.2%
XGRO.TO
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

XIN.TO
6.8%
XGRO.TO
3.8%

Basic Materials

XIN.TO
5.7%
XGRO.TO
5.6%

Communication Services

XIN.TO
4.0%
XGRO.TO
6.8%

Energy

XIN.TO
3.3%
XGRO.TO
7.2%

Utilities

XIN.TO
3.1%
XGRO.TO
1.5%

Real Estate

XIN.TO
1.6%
XGRO.TO
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio

Often compared with XIN.TO:
XIN.TO vs. XEF.TOXIN.TO vs. XFH.TOXIN.TO vs. XWD.TOXIN.TO vs. XIU.TOXIN.TO vs. GBAL.TOXIN.TO vs. XUS-U.TOXIN.TO vs. XDW0.L
Often compared with XGRO.TO:
XGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TOXGRO.TO vs. VGRO.TOXGRO.TO vs. VEQT.TOXGRO.TO vs. XCG.TOXGRO.TO vs. TGRO.TOXGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TOXGRO.TO vs. XAW.TO

Return for Risk

XIN.TO vs. XGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XIN.TO
XIN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XIN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XIN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO
XGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIN.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XIN.TOXGRO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.66
2.18

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.37
3.09

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.41

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

3.30

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.95

14.67

-5.72

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XIN.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the XGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIN.TO and XGRO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XIN.TOXGRO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.18

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.99

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.84

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.35

+0.04

Drawdowns

XIN.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.14%, which is greater than XGRO.TO's maximum drawdown of -47.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIN.TO and XGRO.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XIN.TOXGRO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.14%

-47.97%

-10.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-7.12%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

-12.47%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.40%

-18.40%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.68%

-25.85%

-7.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.18%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.36%

-8.49%

-3.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

1.60%

+0.78%

Volatility

XIN.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) at 3.43%. This indicates that XIN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XIN.TOXGRO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

3.43%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

9.19%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

10.78%

+2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.72%

11.05%

+3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.44%

12.26%

+4.18%

XIN.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIN.TO has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than XGRO.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

XIN.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison

XIN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than XGRO.TO's 1.76% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio		1.76%1.92%1.98%2.22%1.86%1.66%1.94%2.21%7.42%2.04%2.65%2.15%
XIN.TO
iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.66%2.90%2.66%2.60%2.27%2.98%2.15%3.06%3.43%2.60%2.90%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

XIN.TO and XGRO.TO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for XIN.TO.

XIN.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while XGRO.TO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for XIN.TO and 0.20% for XGRO.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIN.TO and XGRO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer