PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIMR vs. XISE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIMR vs. XISE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September (XISE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIMR achieves a 4.15% return, which is significantly higher than XISE's 3.14% return.


XIMR

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.12%
YTD
4.15%
6M
4.33%
1Y
7.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XISE

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.32%
YTD
3.14%
6M
3.12%
1Y
6.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIMR vs. XISE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XIMR and XISE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024

0.52

The correlation between XIMR and XISE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIMR vs. XISE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIMR
XIMR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XIMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XIMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

XISE
XISE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XISE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XISE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XISE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XISE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XISE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIMR vs. XISE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September (XISE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XIMRXISEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.20

1.52

+0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.29

3.52

+3.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

59.00

19.66

+39.34

XIMR vs. XISE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIMR Sharpe Ratio is 3.87, which is higher than the XISE Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIMR and XISE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XIMR vs. XISE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIMR drawdown since its inception was -5.12%, smaller than the maximum XISE drawdown of -6.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIMR and XISE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIMRXISEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-6.17%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.08%

-1.88%

+0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.08%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.17%

-0.24%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.13%

0.34%

-0.21%

Volatility

XIMR vs. XISE - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) has a higher volatility of 0.79% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September (XISE) at 0.36%. This indicates that XIMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XISE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIMRXISEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

0.36%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.79%

2.33%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08%

2.92%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.34%

4.88%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.34%

4.88%

-0.54%

XIMR vs. XISE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XIMR and XISE have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

XIMR vs. XISE - Dividend Comparison

XIMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, more than XISE's 5.91% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XIMR and XISE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XIMR has higher volatility (0.79%) compared to XISE (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIMR dropped -5.12% vs XISE's -6.17%.

On 1-year performance, XIMR leads with 7.87% vs 6.58% for XISE. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, XISE has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XIMR has performed better with a 7.87% return vs 6.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XIMR and XISE have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

XIMR has the higher dividend yield at 6.43%, compared with 5.91% for XISE.

XIMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIMR and XISE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer