PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XILSX vs. APHFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XILSX vs. APHFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) and Artisan High Income Fund Class I (APHFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XILSX achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than APHFX's 0.92% return.


XILSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.95%
6M
8.36%
YTD
10.04%
1Y
23.43%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.48%

APHFX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.55%
6M
0.32%
YTD
0.92%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
7.86%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

XILSX vs. APHFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XILSX
Pioneer ILS Interval Fund
10.04%18.70%18.93%18.65%1.23%-1.10%7.37%2.60%-2.11%-8.83%
APHFX
Artisan High Income Fund Class I
0.92%8.43%8.60%13.77%-10.93%4.09%10.22%14.26%-1.32%7.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XILSX and APHFX is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XILSX vs. APHFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XILSX
XILSX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
XILSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XILSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
XILSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
XILSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XILSX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

APHFX
APHFX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
APHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
APHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
APHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
APHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XILSX vs. APHFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) and Artisan High Income Fund Class I (APHFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XILSXAPHFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+75.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

41.51

1.35

+40.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

112.69

1.59

+111.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

769.28

7.07

+762.21

XILSX vs. APHFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XILSX Sharpe Ratio is 7.88, which is higher than the APHFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XILSX and APHFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XILSX vs. APHFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XILSX drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, smaller than the maximum APHFX drawdown of -21.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XILSX and APHFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XILSXAPHFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-21.51%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.10%

-2.74%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.36%

-3.29%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.27%

-14.80%

+8.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.55%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-2.46%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

0.61%

-0.58%

Volatility

XILSX vs. APHFX - Volatility Comparison

Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) has a higher volatility of 0.52% compared to Artisan High Income Fund Class I (APHFX) at 0.47%. This indicates that XILSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APHFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XILSXAPHFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

0.47%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.57%

2.42%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02%

3.00%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.78%

4.91%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.90%

5.28%

-1.38%

XILSX vs. APHFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XILSX has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than APHFX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

XILSX vs. APHFX - Dividend Comparison

XILSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.64%, more than APHFX's 6.46% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
APHFX
Artisan High Income Fund Class I
6.46%6.96%7.39%5.56%5.83%5.50%6.01%6.44%7.25%7.96%
XILSX
Pioneer ILS Interval Fund
8.64%9.51%13.06%12.82%2.68%2.04%5.20%6.63%6.40%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XILSX and APHFX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XILSX has higher volatility (0.52%) compared to APHFX (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XILSX dropped -14.53% vs APHFX's -21.51%.

XILSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.88 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XILSX and APHFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer