XIJN vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

XIJN (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XIJN is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. XIJN is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past year, XIJN returned 7.33% vs 1594.34% for BWET. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. XIJN charges 0.85%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

XIJN vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June (XIJN) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIJN achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 1,000.26% return.

XIJN

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 2.62%
• 6M: 2.81%
• 1Y: 7.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 13.07%
• YTD: 1,000.26%
• 6M: 797.52%
• 1Y: 1,594.34%
• 3Y*: 116.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIJN vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XIJN FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June	2.62%	7.47%	3.67%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	1,000.26%	96.22%	-40.32%

Correlation

The correlation between XIJN and BWET is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024	-0.04

Return for Risk

XIJN vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIJN

XIJN Risk / Return Rank: 97
XIJN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
XIJN Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XIJN Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XIJN Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
XIJN Martin Ratio Rank: 98

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 99
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIJN vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June (XIJN) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XIJN	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.85	17.93	-14.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.97	6.48	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.00	1.94	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.69	57.70	-48.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	51.78	152.12	-100.34

XIJN vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIJN Sharpe Ratio is 3.85, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 17.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIJN and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XIJN vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIJN drawdown since its inception was -4.65%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIJN and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	XIJN	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.65%	-56.90%	+52.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.75%	-30.64%	+29.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.15%	-23.81%	+23.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.14%	11.60%	-11.46%

Volatility

XIJN vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June (XIJN) is 0.20%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 25.50%. This indicates that XIJN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XIJN	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.20%	25.50%	-25.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.23%	88.99%	-87.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89%	98.69%	-96.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.46%	70.46%	-66.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.46%	70.46%	-66.00%

XIJN vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIJN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XIJN vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

XIJN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XIJN FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June	7.02%	6.62%	2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XIJN and BWET in my portfolio?

XIJN and BWET have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XIJN or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (25.50%) compared to XIJN (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIJN dropped -4.65% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, XIJN or BWET?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1594.34% vs 7.33% for XIJN. On fees, XIJN is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XIJN has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XIJN or BWET?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1594.34% return vs 7.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XIJN or BWET?

XIJN is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XIJN or BWET?

XIJN has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between XIJN and BWET?

XIJN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XIJN and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.93 vs 3.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.