PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIJN vs. APRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIJN vs. APRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June (XIJN) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIJN achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than APRB's 4.77% return.


XIJN

1D
0.02%
1M
0.35%
YTD
2.49%
6M
3.12%
1Y
7.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRB

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.69%
YTD
4.77%
6M
5.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIJN vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XIJN and APRB is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIJN vs. APRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIJN
XIJN Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XIJN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIJN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIJN Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XIJN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIJN Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

APRB
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIJN vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June (XIJN) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XIJNAPRBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

53.25

XIJN vs. APRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XIJNAPRBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

2.00

-0.41

Drawdowns

XIJN vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIJN drawdown since its inception was -4.65%, roughly equal to the maximum APRB drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIJN and APRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIJNAPRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-4.59%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.11%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.15%

-0.74%

+0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.14%

Volatility

XIJN vs. APRB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIJNAPRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88%

5.98%

-4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.51%

5.98%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.51%

5.98%

-1.47%

XIJN vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIJN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XIJN vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison

XIJN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%, while APRB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
APRB
Aptus April Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
XIJN
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June
6.95%6.62%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


XIJN and APRB have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XIJN.

XIJN has the higher dividend yield at 6.95%, compared with 0.00% for APRB.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XIJN and 0.25% for APRB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIJN and APRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer