XIGS.TO vs. ZQB.TO
XIGS.TO (iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and ZQB.TO (BMO High Quality Corporate Bond Index ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, XIGS.TO returned 1.33%/yr vs 2.53%/yr for ZQB.TO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XIGS.TO vs. ZQB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIGS.TO achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than ZQB.TO's 1.35% return.
XIGS.TO
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 2.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
ZQB.TO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- 5.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.53%
- 10Y*
- —
XIGS.TO vs. ZQB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIGS.TO iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -0.01% | 4.82% | 3.76% | 5.39% | -5.89% | -0.97% |
ZQB.TO BMO High Quality Corporate Bond Index ETF | 1.35% | 4.80% | 6.78% | 6.49% | -5.39% | -1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIGS.TO and ZQB.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIGS.TO vs. ZQB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XIGS.TO
ZQB.TO
XIGS.TO vs. ZQB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO) and BMO High Quality Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZQB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XIGS.TO | ZQB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.39 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 2.35 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.93 | 8.27 | -4.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XIGS.TO vs. ZQB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIGS.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.12%, roughly equal to the maximum ZQB.TO drawdown of -10.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIGS.TO and ZQB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIGS.TO | ZQB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.12% | -10.18% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.60% | -1.79% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.60% | -1.79% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.12% | -9.64% | -0.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.45% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.87% | -2.33% | -0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 0.51% | +0.05% |
Volatility
XIGS.TO vs. ZQB.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.74% compared to BMO High Quality Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZQB.TO) at 0.69%. This indicates that XIGS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZQB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIGS.TO | ZQB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | 0.69% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.73% | 1.80% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17% | 2.24% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 3.50% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 4.17% | -0.87% |
Dividends
XIGS.TO vs. ZQB.TO - Dividend Comparison
XIGS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than ZQB.TO's 3.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIGS.TO iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 4.54% | 4.10% | 3.71% | 3.03% | 1.75% | 0.84% | 0.00% |
ZQB.TO BMO High Quality Corporate Bond Index ETF | 3.93% | 3.67% | 3.39% | 3.00% | 2.80% | 2.58% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIGS.TO and ZQB.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO.
Find the right allocation for XIGS.TO and ZQB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer