PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIGS.TO vs. VAB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIGS.TO vs. VAB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO) and Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIGS.TO achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than VAB.TO's 2.17% return.


XIGS.TO

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
0.05%
1Y
2.00%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
10Y*

VAB.TO

1D
0.43%
1M
1.01%
YTD
2.17%
6M
1.94%
1Y
3.50%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*
1.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIGS.TO vs. VAB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XIGS.TO
iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
-0.04%4.82%3.76%5.39%-5.89%-0.97%
VAB.TO
Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
2.17%2.28%3.98%6.90%-11.86%0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between XIGS.TO and VAB.TO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021

0.49

The correlation between XIGS.TO and VAB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIGS.TO vs. VAB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIGS.TO
XIGS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XIGS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIGS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIGS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XIGS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIGS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

VAB.TO
VAB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VAB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VAB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIGS.TO vs. VAB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO) and Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XIGS.TOVAB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.14

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.24

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.56

2.93

+0.63

XIGS.TO vs. VAB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIGS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the VAB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIGS.TO and VAB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XIGS.TO vs. VAB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIGS.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.12%, smaller than the maximum VAB.TO drawdown of -18.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIGS.TO and VAB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIGS.TOVAB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.12%

-18.39%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.60%

-2.83%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.60%

-5.31%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-1.38%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-4.10%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

1.20%

-0.64%

Volatility

XIGS.TO vs. VAB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO) is 0.60%, while Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB.TO) has a volatility of 1.06%. This indicates that XIGS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIGS.TOVAB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

1.06%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.63%

3.36%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25%

4.41%

-2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.30%

6.58%

-3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.30%

6.47%

-3.17%

XIGS.TO vs. VAB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIGS.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than VAB.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XIGS.TO vs. VAB.TO - Dividend Comparison

XIGS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than VAB.TO's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAB.TO
Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
3.30%3.33%3.19%2.95%2.87%2.48%2.51%2.65%2.80%2.77%2.75%2.79%
XIGS.TO
iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
4.46%4.10%3.71%3.03%1.75%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XIGS.TO and VAB.TO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VAB.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAB.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XIGS.TO.

XIGS.TO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VAB.TO is Total Bond Market. XIGS.TO tracks ICE BofA 1-5 Year US Corporate Index (CAD-Hedged), while VAB.TO tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Canadian Float Adjusted Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XIGS.TO and 0.09% for VAB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIGS.TO and VAB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer