XIGS.TO vs. RBO.TO
XIGS.TO (iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and RBO.TO (RBC 1-5 Year Laddered Canadian Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. XIGS.TO is passively managed, while RBO.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XIGS.TO returned 1.33%/yr vs 2.32%/yr for RBO.TO. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XIGS.TO vs. RBO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIGS.TO achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than RBO.TO's 1.41% return.
XIGS.TO
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 2.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
RBO.TO
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- 2.40%
XIGS.TO vs. RBO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIGS.TO iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -0.01% | 4.82% | 3.76% | 5.39% | -5.89% | -0.97% |
RBO.TO RBC 1-5 Year Laddered Canadian Corporate Bond ETF | 1.41% | 4.23% | 6.06% | 6.16% | -5.32% | -0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIGS.TO and RBO.TO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021 | 0.39 |
The correlation between XIGS.TO and RBO.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIGS.TO vs. RBO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XIGS.TO
RBO.TO
XIGS.TO vs. RBO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO) and RBC 1-5 Year Laddered Canadian Corporate Bond ETF (RBO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XIGS.TO | RBO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.30 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 1.92 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.93 | 6.93 | -3.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XIGS.TO vs. RBO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIGS.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.12%, smaller than the maximum RBO.TO drawdown of -20.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIGS.TO and RBO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIGS.TO | RBO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.12% | -20.46% | +10.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.60% | -1.75% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.60% | -1.75% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.12% | -7.89% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.16% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.87% | -1.34% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 0.48% | +0.08% |
Volatility
XIGS.TO vs. RBO.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.74% compared to RBC 1-5 Year Laddered Canadian Corporate Bond ETF (RBO.TO) at 0.41%. This indicates that XIGS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIGS.TO | RBO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | 0.41% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.73% | 1.81% | -0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17% | 2.18% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 2.95% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 7.74% | -4.44% |
Dividends
XIGS.TO vs. RBO.TO - Dividend Comparison
XIGS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than RBO.TO's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBO.TO RBC 1-5 Year Laddered Canadian Corporate Bond ETF | 3.90% | 3.67% | 3.35% | 2.56% | 2.64% | 2.32% | 2.41% | 2.77% | 2.96% | 3.02% | 3.26% | 3.54% |
XIGS.TO iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 4.54% | 4.10% | 3.71% | 3.03% | 1.75% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIGS.TO and RBO.TO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and RBC.
Find the right allocation for XIGS.TO and RBO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer