XIC.TO vs. SCHD
XIC.TO (iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XIC.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XIC.TO returned 12.48%/yr vs 13.54%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.06% expense ratio.
Performance
XIC.TO vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XIC.TO is traded in CAD, while SCHD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIC.TO achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.03% return. Over the past 10 years, XIC.TO has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 12.48%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.54% annualized return.
XIC.TO
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 12.90%
- 1Y
- 34.79%
- 3Y*
- 23.62%
- 5Y*
- 14.60%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 20.03%
- 6M
- 17.69%
- 1Y
- 28.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
XIC.TO vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIC.TO iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 10.75% | 31.51% | 21.48% | 11.73% | -5.82% | 23.42% | 5.61% | 22.76% | -8.72% | 8.99% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.52% | -0.44% | 21.25% | 2.24% | 3.64% | 28.70% | 13.08% | 21.03% | 2.45% | 13.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIC.TO and SCHD is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XIC.TO and SCHD has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XIC.TO vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XIC.TO
SCHD
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Financial Services
XIC.TO
SCHD
Energy
XIC.TO
SCHD
Basic Materials
XIC.TO
SCHD
Industrials
XIC.TO
SCHD
Technology
XIC.TO
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
XIC.TO
SCHD
Utilities
XIC.TO
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
XIC.TO
SCHD
Communication Services
XIC.TO
SCHD
Real Estate
XIC.TO
SCHD
-
Healthcare
XIC.TO
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIC.TO vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
XIC.TO
SCHD
XIC.TO vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XIC.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.47 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | 6.61 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.44 | 19.13 | -1.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XIC.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | 2.57 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 0.90 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.90 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.12 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
XIC.TO vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIC.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.21%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIC.TO and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIC.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.21% | -26.93% | -21.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.29% | -4.30% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.27% | -15.30% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.24% | -15.30% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.21% | -26.93% | -10.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -1.22% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.04% | -2.86% | -4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 1.48% | +0.52% |
Volatility
XIC.TO vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.63%. This indicates that XIC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIC.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | 2.63% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.33% | 8.23% | +2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.67% | 11.10% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.13% | 12.63% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 15.18% | -0.22% |
XIC.TO vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XIC.TO and SCHD have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XIC.TO vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
XIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
XIC.TO iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 2.02% | 2.23% | 2.64% | 2.95% | 3.10% | 2.44% | 3.03% | 3.01% | 3.19% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIC.TO and SCHD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XIC.TO and SCHD have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.
XIC.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. XIC.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab.
Find the right allocation for XIC.TO and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer