PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XIC.TO vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XIC.TO vs. LVHI

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

XIC.TO (iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XIC.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XIC.TO returned 14.41%/yr vs 18.97%/yr for LVHI. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XIC.TO charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.

Performance

XIC.TO vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XIC.TO is traded in CAD, while LVHI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LVHI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIC.TO achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 13.44% return.

XIC.TO

1D
0.27%
1M
1.36%
YTD
9.79%
6M
11.86%
1Y
33.59%
3Y*
23.51%
5Y*
14.41%
10Y*
12.53%

LVHI

1D
0.62%
1M
2.83%
YTD
13.44%
6M
14.41%
1Y
31.85%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
18.97%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIC.TO vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF		9.79%31.51%21.48%11.74%-5.82%23.43%5.61%22.76%-8.72%8.99%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF		13.48%21.32%24.53%14.66%10.42%18.13%-10.92%13.47%2.75%4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XIC.TO and LVHI is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016

0.48

The correlation between XIC.TO and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

XIC.TO vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XIC.TO
LVHI

Financial Services

33.8%
23.6%

Basic Materials

17.7%
6.1%

Energy

17.3%
17.4%

Industrials

10.2%
13.4%

Technology

7.1%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
8.7%

Utilities

2.8%
10.4%

Communication Services

1.8%
5.8%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.9%

Healthcare

0.1%
7.4%

Financial Services

XIC.TO
33.8%
LVHI
23.6%

Basic Materials

XIC.TO
17.7%
LVHI
6.1%

Energy

XIC.TO
17.3%
LVHI
17.4%

Industrials

XIC.TO
10.2%
LVHI
13.4%

Technology

XIC.TO
7.1%
LVHI
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XIC.TO
3.8%
LVHI
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

XIC.TO
2.8%
LVHI
8.7%

Utilities

XIC.TO
2.8%
LVHI
10.4%

Communication Services

XIC.TO
1.8%
LVHI
5.8%

Real Estate

XIC.TO
1.5%
LVHI
1.9%

Healthcare

XIC.TO
0.1%
LVHI
7.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF

Often compared with XIC.TO:
XIC.TO vs. XIU.TOXIC.TO vs. VDY.TOXIC.TO vs. ZCN.TOXIC.TO vs. VCE.TOXIC.TO vs. XEF.TOXIC.TO vs. VEQT.TOXIC.TO vs. VO
Often compared with LVHI:
LVHI vs. SCHDLVHI vs. IDVLVHI vs. DIVILVHI vs. VYMILVHI vs. VOOLVHI vs. SPYLVHI vs. VFQY

Return for Risk

XIC.TO vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XIC.TO
XIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIC.TO vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XIC.TOLVHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.61
3.09

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.35
4.34

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.55

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

5.65

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.76

19.22

-2.46

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XIC.TO vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIC.TO and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XIC.TOLVHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

3.09

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

1.48

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.77

-0.21

Drawdowns

XIC.TO vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIC.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.27%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -29.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIC.TO and LVHI.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XIC.TOLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.27%

-29.52%

-17.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-5.66%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.27%

-12.48%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.24%

-12.48%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.21%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

-0.53%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-4.54%

-2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.66%

+0.35%

Volatility

XIC.TO vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.66%. This indicates that XIC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XIC.TOLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

2.66%

+1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.63%

8.42%

+2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.96%

10.37%

+2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.19%

12.84%

+0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.98%

15.36%

-0.38%

XIC.TO vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIC.TO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

XIC.TO vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

XIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than LVHI's 4.79% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF		4.79%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%0.00%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF		2.04%2.23%2.64%2.96%3.10%2.45%3.03%3.01%3.19%2.49%2.72%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

XIC.TO and LVHI have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIC.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

XIC.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. XIC.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XIC.TO and 0.40% for LVHI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIC.TO and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer