PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIC.TO vs. IXN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIC.TO vs. IXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XIC.TO is traded in CAD, while IXN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IXN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIC.TO achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly lower than IXN's 34.36% return. Over the past 10 years, XIC.TO has underperformed IXN with an annualized return of 12.53%, while IXN has yielded a comparatively higher 25.90% annualized return.


XIC.TO

1D
0.27%
1M
1.36%
YTD
9.79%
6M
11.86%
1Y
33.59%
3Y*
23.51%
5Y*
14.41%
10Y*
12.53%

IXN

1D
2.69%
1M
6.33%
YTD
34.36%
6M
31.08%
1Y
64.86%
3Y*
35.13%
5Y*
25.12%
10Y*
25.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIC.TO vs. IXN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
9.79%31.51%21.48%11.74%-5.82%23.43%5.61%22.76%-8.72%8.99%
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
34.41%19.53%35.41%49.34%-25.42%29.52%40.22%41.79%2.51%31.67%

Correlation

The correlation between XIC.TO and IXN is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2006

0.54

The correlation between XIC.TO and IXN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

XIC.TO vs. IXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XIC.TO
IXN

Financial Services

33.8%

-

Basic Materials

17.7%

-

Energy

17.3%
0.1%

Industrials

10.2%
0.2%

Technology

7.1%
99.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.8%

-

Utilities

2.8%

-

Communication Services

1.8%

-

Real Estate

1.5%
0.0%

Healthcare

0.1%
0.1%

Financial Services

XIC.TO
33.8%
IXN

-

Basic Materials

XIC.TO
17.7%
IXN

-

Energy

XIC.TO
17.3%
IXN
0.1%

Industrials

XIC.TO
10.2%
IXN
0.2%

Technology

XIC.TO
7.1%
IXN
99.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XIC.TO
3.8%
IXN

-

Consumer Defensive

XIC.TO
2.8%
IXN

-

Utilities

XIC.TO
2.8%
IXN

-

Communication Services

XIC.TO
1.8%
IXN

-

Real Estate

XIC.TO
1.5%
IXN
0.0%

Healthcare

XIC.TO
0.1%
IXN
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIC.TO vs. IXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIC.TO
XIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

IXN
IXN Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIC.TO vs. IXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XIC.TOIXNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

4.64

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.76

14.27

+2.50

XIC.TO vs. IXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the IXN Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIC.TO and IXN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XIC.TOIXNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.78

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

0.98

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

1.02

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.64

-0.08

Drawdowns

XIC.TO vs. IXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIC.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.27%, which is greater than IXN's maximum drawdown of -43.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIC.TO and IXN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIC.TOIXNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.27%

-43.16%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-14.04%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.27%

-25.94%

+13.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.24%

-31.53%

+15.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.21%

-31.53%

-5.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

-6.77%

+4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-9.06%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

4.56%

-2.55%

Volatility

XIC.TO vs. IXN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) is 4.28%, while iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a volatility of 11.57%. This indicates that XIC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIC.TOIXNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

11.57%

-7.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.63%

19.85%

-9.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.96%

23.53%

-10.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.19%

25.80%

-12.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.98%

25.46%

-10.48%

XIC.TO vs. IXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIC.TO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IXN's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

XIC.TO vs. IXN - Dividend Comparison

XIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than IXN's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
0.79%1.04%0.43%0.55%0.81%0.58%0.63%1.06%0.94%0.93%1.03%1.12%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
2.04%2.23%2.64%2.96%3.10%2.45%3.03%3.01%3.19%2.49%2.72%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


XIC.TO and IXN have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIC.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXN.

XIC.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while IXN is Technology Equities. XIC.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index, while IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XIC.TO and 0.46% for IXN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIC.TO and IXN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer