XIC.TO vs. DMEC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XIC.TO (iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) and DMEC.TO (Desjardins Canadian Equity Index ETF) are both Canada Equities funds - XIC.TO tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index while DMEC.TO tracks the Solactive Canada Broad Market Index (CA NTR). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XIC.TO returned 34.79% vs 34.96% for DMEC.TO. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XIC.TO charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for DMEC.TO.

Performance

XIC.TO vs. DMEC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and Desjardins Canadian Equity Index ETF (DMEC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XIC.TO having a 10.75% return and DMEC.TO slightly lower at 10.72%.

XIC.TO

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 3.59%
• YTD: 10.75%
• 6M: 12.90%
• 1Y: 34.79%
• 3Y*: 23.62%
• 5Y*: 14.60%
• 10Y*: 12.48%

DMEC.TO

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: 3.70%
• YTD: 10.72%
• 6M: 13.13%
• 1Y: 34.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIC.TO vs. DMEC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XIC.TO iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF	10.75%	31.51%	16.35%
DMEC.TO Desjardins Canadian Equity Index ETF	10.72%	31.87%	16.56%

Correlation

The correlation between XIC.TO and DMEC.TO is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2024	0.91

The correlation between XIC.TO and DMEC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XIC.TO vs. DMEC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIC.TO

XIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 80
XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
XIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
XIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 81
XIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
XIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

DMEC.TO

DMEC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 82
DMEC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
DMEC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
DMEC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
DMEC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
DMEC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIC.TO vs. DMEC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and Desjardins Canadian Equity Index ETF (DMEC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XIC.TO	DMEC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.76	2.80	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	3.59	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.51	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	3.73	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.44	17.20	+0.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XIC.TO vs. DMEC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the DMEC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIC.TO and DMEC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XIC.TO	DMEC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.76	2.80	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	2.21	-1.66

Drawdowns

XIC.TO vs. DMEC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIC.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.21%, which is greater than DMEC.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIC.TO and DMEC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XIC.TO	DMEC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.21%	-12.15%	-36.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.29%	-9.41%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-1.07%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.04%	-1.42%	-5.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	2.04%	-0.04%

Volatility

XIC.TO vs. DMEC.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and Desjardins Canadian Equity Index ETF (DMEC.TO) have volatilities of 3.48% and 3.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XIC.TO	DMEC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	3.42%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.33%	10.28%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.67%	12.56%	+0.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.13%	12.97%	+0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.96%	12.97%	+1.99%

XIC.TO vs. DMEC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIC.TO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than DMEC.TO's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XIC.TO vs. DMEC.TO - Dividend Comparison

XIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than DMEC.TO's 1.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DMEC.TO Desjardins Canadian Equity Index ETF	1.91%	1.78%	1.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XIC.TO iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF	2.02%	2.23%	2.64%	2.95%	3.10%	2.44%	3.03%	3.01%	3.19%	2.49%	2.72%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XIC.TO and DMEC.TO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, XIC.TO and DMEC.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XIC.TO or DMEC.TO?

On fees, DMEC.TO is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XIC.TO or DMEC.TO?

DMEC.TO is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for XIC.TO.

What is the main difference between XIC.TO and DMEC.TO?

XIC.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index, while DMEC.TO tracks Solactive Canada Broad Market Index (CA NTR). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Desjardins. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XIC.TO and 0.05% for DMEC.TO.