PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMEC.TO vs. KNGC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DMEC.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Desjardins Canadian Equity Index ETF (DMEC.TO) and Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DMEC.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DMEC.TO
Desjardins Canadian Equity Index ETF
3.74%31.87%14.43%
KNGC.TO
Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF
17.07%41.07%110,085.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMEC.TO achieves a 3.74% return, which is significantly lower than KNGC.TO's 17.07% return.


DMEC.TO

1D
2.63%
1M
-4.62%
YTD
3.74%
6M
10.40%
1Y
34.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KNGC.TO

1D
0.06%
1M
0.71%
YTD
17.07%
6M
26.53%
1Y
63.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DMEC.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMEC.TO has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than KNGC.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

DMEC.TO vs. KNGC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMEC.TO
DMEC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DMEC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMEC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMEC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DMEC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMEC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

KNGC.TO
KNGC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMEC.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Desjardins Canadian Equity Index ETF (DMEC.TO) and Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMEC.TOKNGC.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

4.06

-1.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.92

4.72

-1.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.87

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

5.55

-2.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.94

29.18

-14.24

DMEC.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMEC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is lower than the KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMEC.TO and KNGC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMEC.TOKNGC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

4.06

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.08

0.08

+2.00

Correlation

The correlation between DMEC.TO and KNGC.TO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DMEC.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Dividend Comparison

DMEC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than KNGC.TO's 1.31% yield.


TTM20252024
DMEC.TO
Desjardins Canadian Equity Index ETF
2.04%1.78%1.39%
KNGC.TO
Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF
1.31%1.69%0.73%

Drawdowns

DMEC.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMEC.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, smaller than the maximum KNGC.TO drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMEC.TO and KNGC.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DMEC.TOKNGC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-20.25%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-11.79%

+1.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.07%

0.00%

-5.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

-3.30%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

2.24%

+0.14%

Volatility

DMEC.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Desjardins Canadian Equity Index ETF (DMEC.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.14% compared to Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) at 2.74%. This indicates that DMEC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNGC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DMEC.TOKNGC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.14%

2.74%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.84%

9.99%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.11%

15.83%

-0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.08%

80,206.60%

-80,193.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.08%

80,206.60%

-80,193.52%