XHYH vs. SPHY
XHYH (BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF) and SPHY (SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - XHYH tracks the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Healthcare Index while SPHY tracks the ICE BofA US High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XHYH returned 9.88%/yr vs 8.98%/yr for SPHY. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XHYH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPHY.
Performance
XHYH vs. SPHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHYH achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than SPHY's 1.63% return.
XHYH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 7.28%
- 3Y*
- 9.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHY
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 7.02%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.41%
- 10Y*
- 5.14%
XHYH vs. SPHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHYH BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF | 1.24% | 10.30% | 9.65% | 12.93% | -12.71% |
SPHY SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | 1.63% | 8.59% | 8.54% | 12.81% | -6.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHYH and SPHY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XHYH and SPHY has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XHYH vs. SPHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHYH
SPHY
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
XHYH
SPHY
-
Consumer Cyclical
XHYH
SPHY
-
Technology
XHYH
SPHY
-
Basic Materials
XHYH
-
SPHY
-
Communication Services
XHYH
-
SPHY
-
Consumer Defensive
XHYH
-
SPHY
-
Energy
XHYH
-
SPHY
Financial Services
XHYH
-
SPHY
Industrials
XHYH
-
SPHY
-
Real Estate
XHYH
-
SPHY
-
Utilities
XHYH
-
SPHY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHYH vs. SPHY — Risk / Return Rank
XHYH
SPHY
XHYH vs. SPHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF (XHYH) and SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHYH | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.38 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 2.92 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.30 | 13.27 | -0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHYH | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.92 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.64 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
XHYH vs. SPHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHYH drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, smaller than the maximum SPHY drawdown of -21.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYH and SPHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHYH | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.84% | -21.97% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.62% | -2.41% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.09% | -4.85% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.14% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -2.29% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 0.53% | +0.13% |
Volatility
XHYH vs. SPHY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF (XHYH) is 0.87%, while SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) has a volatility of 1.14%. This indicates that XHYH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHYH | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 1.14% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.15% | 2.91% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.32% | 3.68% | +0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.55% | 7.17% | +1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.55% | 7.89% | +0.66% |
XHYH vs. SPHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHYH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHY's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHYH vs. SPHY - Dividend Comparison
XHYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, less than SPHY's 7.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHY SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | 7.26% | 7.38% | 7.80% | 7.30% | 6.47% | 5.13% | 5.63% | 5.73% | 4.09% | 4.41% | 4.27% | 4.29% |
XHYH BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF | 6.58% | 6.95% | 6.95% | 7.73% | 6.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHYH and SPHY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHY has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to XHYH (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHYH dropped -17.84% vs SPHY's -21.97%.
On 3-year performance, XHYH leads with 9.88% vs 8.98% for SPHY. On fees, SPHY is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, XHYH has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XHYH has performed better with a 9.88% return vs 8.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHY is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHYH.
SPHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.26%, compared with 6.58% for XHYH.
XHYH tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Healthcare Index, while SPHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHYH and 0.05% for SPHY.
SPHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XHYH and SPHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer