PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHYG.DE vs. XDWT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHYG.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XHYG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHYG.DE achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than XDWT.DE's 25.23% return. Over the past 10 years, XHYG.DE has underperformed XDWT.DE with an annualized return of 3.16%, while XDWT.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 24.00% annualized return.


XHYG.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.00%
6M
1.35%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
6.42%
5Y*
2.78%
10Y*
3.16%

XDWT.DE

1D
-2.03%
1M
12.76%
YTD
25.23%
6M
23.47%
1Y
47.87%
3Y*
29.29%
5Y*
22.52%
10Y*
24.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHYG.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XHYG.DE
Xtrackers EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
1.00%4.63%6.16%11.48%-8.51%2.12%1.72%9.91%-3.67%4.46%
XDWT.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
25.23%9.56%41.11%50.00%-28.10%41.76%30.98%51.77%0.78%21.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XHYG.DE and XDWT.DE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHYG.DE vs. XDWT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHYG.DE
XHYG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XHYG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHYG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHYG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XHYG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHYG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWT.DE
XDWT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XDWT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHYG.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XHYG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHYG.DEXDWT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.38

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

3.12

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.17

8.24

-3.07

XHYG.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHYG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the XDWT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHYG.DE and XDWT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHYG.DEXDWT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

2.38

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.99

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

1.11

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.09

-0.65

Drawdowns

XHYG.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHYG.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum XDWT.DE drawdown of -31.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYG.DE and XDWT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHYG.DEXDWT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.00%

-31.61%

+7.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.81%

-15.59%

+12.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.64%

-29.46%

+25.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.54%

-29.46%

+14.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.00%

-31.61%

+7.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-2.61%

+2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-5.82%

+3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

5.91%

-5.24%

Volatility

XHYG.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XHYG.DE) is 1.15%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that XHYG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHYG.DEXDWT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

7.11%

-5.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

14.96%

-11.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53%

20.39%

-16.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.45%

22.55%

-17.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.17%

21.46%

-14.29%

XHYG.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHYG.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWT.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XHYG.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Dividend Comparison

XHYG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, while XDWT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
XDWT.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XHYG.DE
Xtrackers EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
4.93%4.75%5.48%3.95%3.70%5.75%2.27%3.54%5.11%3.71%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHYG.DE and XDWT.DE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XHYG.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XHYG.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWT.DE.

XHYG.DE is categorized as European High Yield Bonds, while XDWT.DE is Technology Equities. XHYG.DE tracks Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR, while XDWT.DE tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XHYG.DE and 0.25% for XDWT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHYG.DE and XDWT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer