XHYF vs. FLRT
Compare and contrast key facts about BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF (XHYF) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT).
XHYF and FLRT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XHYF is a passively managed fund by BondBloxx that tracks the performance of the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Financial & REIT. It was launched on Feb 15, 2022. FLRT is an actively managed fund by Pacific Life. It was launched on Feb 19, 2015.
Performance
XHYF vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XHYF vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHYF BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF | -1.42% | 8.69% | 8.65% | 13.29% | -7.22% |
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | -0.20% | 6.24% | 9.18% | 14.59% | -2.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHYF achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than FLRT's -0.20% return.
XHYF
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- -1.42%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 5.44%
- 3Y*
- 8.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLRT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 5.44%
- 3Y*
- 8.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 4.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XHYF vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHYF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XHYF vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank
XHYF
FLRT
XHYF vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF (XHYF) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHYF | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 1.80 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 2.31 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.56 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 2.15 | -0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.45 | 8.63 | -2.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHYF | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.80 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.73 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between XHYF and FLRT is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XHYF vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison
XHYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%, which matches FLRT's 6.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHYF BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF | 6.95% | 6.73% | 7.11% | 7.00% | 5.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | 6.92% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
Drawdowns
XHYF vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHYF drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYF and FLRT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHYF | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.92% | -20.96% | +8.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.70% | -2.47% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -0.88% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -1.43% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 0.62% | +0.25% |
Volatility
XHYF vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison
BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF (XHYF) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.46%. This indicates that XHYF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XHYF | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 0.46% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 1.22% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.73% | 3.04% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.22% | 2.32% | +4.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.22% | 6.24% | +0.98% |