PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHYF vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHYF vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF (XHYF) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHYF achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 79.04% return.


XHYF

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
0.51%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
-2.52%
1M
-6.01%
YTD
79.04%
6M
69.31%
1Y
81.31%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
19.05%
10Y*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHYF vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XHYF
BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF
-0.10%8.69%8.65%13.29%-7.22%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
79.04%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%14.93%

Correlation

The correlation between XHYF and DBE is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022

0.04

The correlation between XHYF and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHYF vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHYF
XHYF Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XHYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHYF Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XHYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHYF Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHYF vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF (XHYF) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHYFDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

5.67

-3.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.44

11.08

-3.63

XHYF vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHYF Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHYF and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHYFDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

2.33

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.09

+0.64

Drawdowns

XHYF vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHYF drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYF and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHYFDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.92%

-86.69%

+73.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

-14.41%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.19%

-23.89%

+19.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-32.03%

+31.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.54%

-57.30%

+54.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

7.37%

-6.63%

Volatility

XHYF vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF (XHYF) is 0.94%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that XHYF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHYFDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

13.05%

-12.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.58%

30.97%

-28.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52%

35.07%

-31.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.14%

29.41%

-22.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.14%

28.34%

-21.20%

XHYF vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHYF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

XHYF vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

XHYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than DBE's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.16%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
XHYF
BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF
6.27%6.73%7.11%7.00%5.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHYF and DBE have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to XHYF (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHYF dropped -12.92% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 3-year performance, DBE leads with 22.41% vs 9.29% for XHYF. On fees, XHYF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XHYF has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBE has performed better with a 22.41% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XHYF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

XHYF has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 2.16% for DBE.

XHYF is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while DBE is Oil & Gas. XHYF tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Financial & REIT, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHYF and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHYF and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer