XHYE vs. GHYB
XHYE (BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF) and GHYB (Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - XHYE tracks the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Energy Index while GHYB tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XHYE returned 8.50%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for GHYB. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XHYE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for GHYB.
Performance
XHYE vs. GHYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHYE achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly higher than GHYB's 1.32% return.
XHYE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 3.82%
- 1Y
- 8.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GHYB
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 6.90%
- 3Y*
- 8.66%
- 5Y*
- 4.02%
- 10Y*
- —
XHYE vs. GHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHYE BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF | 3.57% | 6.73% | 7.46% | 11.49% | -1.77% |
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.32% | 9.38% | 7.76% | 12.13% | -6.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHYE and GHYB is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.84 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XHYE and GHYB has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHYE vs. GHYB — Risk / Return Rank
XHYE
GHYB
XHYE vs. GHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF (XHYE) and Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHYE | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.38 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.50 | 2.59 | +5.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.98 | 11.85 | +15.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHYE | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 1.98 | +1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.55 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
XHYE vs. GHYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHYE drawdown since its inception was -8.87%, smaller than the maximum GHYB drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYE and GHYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHYE | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.87% | -21.48% | +12.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.21% | -2.67% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.40% | -4.66% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.20% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -2.57% | +1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | 0.58% | -0.20% |
Volatility
XHYE vs. GHYB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF (XHYE) is 0.56%, while Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that XHYE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHYE | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.56% | 1.08% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.98% | 2.72% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24% | 3.50% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.60% | 7.69% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.60% | 8.28% | -0.68% |
XHYE vs. GHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHYE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GHYB's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHYE vs. GHYB - Dividend Comparison
XHYE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, less than GHYB's 6.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.80% | 7.00% | 6.65% | 6.20% | 5.67% | 4.46% | 4.75% | 5.57% | 5.68% | 1.45% |
XHYE BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF | 5.79% | 6.55% | 7.04% | 6.46% | 5.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHYE and GHYB have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHYB has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to XHYE (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHYE dropped -8.87% vs GHYB's -21.48%.
On 3-year performance, GHYB leads with 8.66% vs 8.50% for XHYE. On fees, GHYB is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, XHYE has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GHYB has performed better with a 8.66% return vs 8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GHYB is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHYE.
GHYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.80%, compared with 5.79% for XHYE.
XHYE tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Energy Index, while GHYB tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHYE and 0.34% for GHYB.
XHYE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XHYE and GHYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer