XHYD vs. SPHY
XHYD (BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF) and SPHY (SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - XHYD tracks the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical while SPHY tracks the ICE BofA US High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XHYD returned 7.51%/yr vs 8.98%/yr for SPHY. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XHYD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPHY.
Performance
XHYD vs. SPHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHYD achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than SPHY's 1.63% return.
XHYD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 5.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHY
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 7.02%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.41%
- 10Y*
- 5.14%
XHYD vs. SPHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 0.44% | 8.33% | 6.29% | 11.75% | -5.80% |
SPHY SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | 1.63% | 8.59% | 8.54% | 12.81% | -6.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHYD and SPHY is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.84 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XHYD and SPHY has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XHYD vs. SPHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHYD
SPHY
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Consumer Defensive
XHYD
SPHY
-
Utilities
XHYD
SPHY
-
Consumer Cyclical
XHYD
SPHY
-
Financial Services
XHYD
SPHY
Industrials
XHYD
SPHY
-
Basic Materials
XHYD
SPHY
-
Communication Services
XHYD
-
SPHY
-
Energy
XHYD
-
SPHY
Healthcare
XHYD
-
SPHY
-
Real Estate
XHYD
-
SPHY
-
Technology
XHYD
-
SPHY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHYD vs. SPHY — Risk / Return Rank
XHYD
SPHY
XHYD vs. SPHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) and SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHYD | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.38 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 2.92 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.53 | 13.27 | -2.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHYD | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.92 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.64 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
XHYD vs. SPHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHYD drawdown since its inception was -11.02%, smaller than the maximum SPHY drawdown of -21.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYD and SPHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHYD | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.02% | -21.97% | +10.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | -2.41% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.70% | -4.85% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -0.14% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -2.29% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 0.53% | +0.03% |
Volatility
XHYD vs. SPHY - Volatility Comparison
BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) has a higher volatility of 1.83% compared to SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) at 1.14%. This indicates that XHYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHYD | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.83% | 1.14% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.28% | 2.91% | +0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 3.68% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 7.17% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 7.89% | -0.74% |
XHYD vs. SPHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHYD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHY's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHYD vs. SPHY - Dividend Comparison
XHYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, less than SPHY's 7.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHY SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | 7.26% | 7.38% | 7.80% | 7.30% | 6.47% | 5.13% | 5.63% | 5.73% | 4.09% | 4.41% | 4.27% | 4.29% |
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 5.31% | 5.83% | 6.32% | 5.80% | 5.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHYD and SPHY have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XHYD has higher volatility (1.83%) compared to SPHY (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHYD dropped -11.02% vs SPHY's -21.97%.
On 3-year performance, SPHY leads with 8.98% vs 7.51% for XHYD. On fees, SPHY is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPHY has performed better with a 8.98% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHY is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHYD.
SPHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.26%, compared with 5.31% for XHYD.
XHYD tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical, while SPHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHYD and 0.05% for SPHY.
SPHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XHYD and SPHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer