XHYD vs. FLRT
Compare and contrast key facts about BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT).
XHYD and FLRT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XHYD is a passively managed fund by BondBloxx that tracks the performance of the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical. It was launched on Feb 15, 2022. FLRT is an actively managed fund by Pacific Life. It was launched on Feb 19, 2015.
Performance
XHYD vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XHYD vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 0.14% | 8.33% | 6.29% | 11.75% | -5.80% |
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | -0.20% | 6.24% | 9.18% | 14.59% | -2.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHYD achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly higher than FLRT's -0.20% return.
XHYD
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 1.63%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- 7.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLRT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 5.44%
- 3Y*
- 8.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 4.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XHYD vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHYD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XHYD vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank
XHYD
FLRT
XHYD vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHYD | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | 1.80 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 2.31 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.56 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 2.15 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.79 | 8.63 | +2.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHYD | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 1.80 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.73 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between XHYD and FLRT is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XHYD vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison
XHYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, less than FLRT's 6.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 5.85% | 5.83% | 6.32% | 5.80% | 5.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | 6.92% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
Drawdowns
XHYD vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHYD drawdown since its inception was -11.02%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYD and FLRT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHYD | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.02% | -20.96% | +9.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.38% | -2.47% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -0.88% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.08% | -1.43% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 0.62% | +0.03% |
Volatility
XHYD vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison
BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.46%. This indicates that XHYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XHYD | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | 0.46% | +1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.80% | 1.22% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.43% | 3.04% | +1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.19% | 2.32% | +4.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.19% | 6.24% | +0.95% |