XHYD vs. BSJR
XHYD (BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF) and BSJR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - XHYD tracks the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical while BSJR tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XHYD returned 7.51%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for BSJR. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XHYD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJR.
Performance
XHYD vs. BSJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHYD achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than BSJR's 1.27% return.
XHYD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 5.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSJR
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 4.78%
- 3Y*
- 7.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- —
XHYD vs. BSJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 0.44% | 8.33% | 6.29% | 11.75% | -5.80% |
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.27% | 7.41% | 7.15% | 11.91% | -7.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHYD and BSJR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.84 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XHYD and BSJR has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XHYD vs. BSJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHYD
BSJR
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
XHYD
BSJR
Utilities
XHYD
BSJR
Consumer Cyclical
XHYD
BSJR
Financial Services
XHYD
BSJR
Industrials
XHYD
BSJR
Basic Materials
XHYD
BSJR
Communication Services
XHYD
-
BSJR
Energy
XHYD
-
BSJR
Healthcare
XHYD
-
BSJR
Real Estate
XHYD
-
BSJR
Technology
XHYD
-
BSJR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHYD vs. BSJR — Risk / Return Rank
XHYD
BSJR
XHYD vs. BSJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHYD | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.45 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 4.13 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.53 | 19.06 | -8.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHYD | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 2.27 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.43 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
XHYD vs. BSJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHYD drawdown since its inception was -11.02%, smaller than the maximum BSJR drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYD and BSJR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHYD | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.02% | -22.58% | +11.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | -1.16% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.70% | -3.15% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -0.11% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -3.25% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 0.25% | +0.31% |
Volatility
XHYD vs. BSJR - Volatility Comparison
BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) has a higher volatility of 1.83% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) at 0.59%. This indicates that XHYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHYD | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.83% | 0.59% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.28% | 1.45% | +1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 2.12% | +1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 6.73% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 9.36% | -2.21% |
XHYD vs. BSJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHYD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJR's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHYD vs. BSJR - Dividend Comparison
XHYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, less than BSJR's 5.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.74% | 6.19% | 6.75% | 6.48% | 5.37% | 4.49% | 4.53% | 1.20% |
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 5.31% | 5.83% | 6.32% | 5.80% | 5.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHYD and BSJR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XHYD has higher volatility (1.83%) compared to BSJR (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHYD dropped -11.02% vs BSJR's -22.58%.
On 3-year performance, BSJR leads with 7.93% vs 7.51% for XHYD. On fees, XHYD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BSJR has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BSJR has performed better with a 7.93% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XHYD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJR.
BSJR has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 5.31% for XHYD.
XHYD tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical, while BSJR tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHYD and 0.42% for BSJR.
BSJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XHYD and BSJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer