SKOR vs. GABF
SKOR (FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SKOR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. SKOR is passively managed, while GABF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SKOR returned 5.67%/yr vs 18.82%/yr for GABF. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SKOR charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.
Performance
SKOR vs. GABF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKOR achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -1.93% return.
SKOR
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- 6M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 2.60%
- 3Y*
- 5.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- 2.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.96%
GABF
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -1.61%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $95.56K | $89.02K | $204.10K | |
| $2.39M | $2.88M | $3.03M |
SKOR vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 0.01% | 7.99% | 4.42% | 7.64% | -1.56% |
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | -1.93% | 3.60% | 44.38% | 38.92% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKOR and GABF is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKOR vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank
SKOR
GABF
SKOR vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SKOR | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.97 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | -0.26 | +1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.98 | -0.56 | +5.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SKOR vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKOR drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, smaller than the maximum GABF drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKOR and GABF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKOR | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.98% | -20.86% | +4.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.09% | -17.16% | +15.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.98% | -20.86% | +17.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -6.75% | +5.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.63% | -4.97% | +2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 7.90% | -7.25% |
Volatility
SKOR vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) is 0.73%, while Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that SKOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKOR | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 4.51% | -3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.15% | 13.17% | -11.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71% | 17.57% | -14.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.43% | 20.37% | -15.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.90% | 20.37% | -15.47% |
SKOR vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKOR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SKOR vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison
SKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than GABF's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 2.00% | 1.96% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 4.30% | 4.70% | 4.90% | 3.90% | 2.57% | 2.55% | 3.38% | 3.53% | 2.85% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKOR and GABF have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GABF has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to SKOR (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKOR dropped -15.98% vs GABF's -20.86%.
On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 18.82% vs 5.67% for SKOR. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SKOR has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 18.82% return vs 5.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for SKOR.
SKOR has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 2.00% for GABF.
SKOR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SKOR and 0.10% for GABF.
SKOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKOR and GABF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer