PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHYC vs. LDRH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XHYC vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYC) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XHYC vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHYC achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than LDRH's 0.66% return.


XHYC

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.19%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
1.02%
1Y
6.47%
3Y*
7.76%
5Y*
10Y*

LDRH

1D
0.15%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.66%
6M
1.72%
1Y
6.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XHYC vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XHYC and LDRH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Return for Risk

XHYC vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHYC
XHYC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XHYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHYC Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XHYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHYC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

LDRH
LDRH Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
LDRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRH Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRH Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHYC vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYC) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHYCLDRHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

1.71

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.09

2.63

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.41

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

2.39

-0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.21

14.61

-6.41

XHYC vs. LDRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHYC Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the LDRH Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHYC and LDRH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHYCLDRHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.71

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.61

-1.00

Correlation

The correlation between XHYC and LDRH is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XHYC vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison

XHYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, less than LDRH's 6.98% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
XHYC
BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF
6.82%6.64%6.71%6.48%5.78%
LDRH
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF
6.98%6.41%1.13%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XHYC vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHYC drawdown since its inception was -13.72%, which is greater than LDRH's maximum drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYC and LDRH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XHYCLDRHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.72%

-3.17%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.81%

-2.82%

-0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-0.32%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-0.25%

-2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

0.46%

+0.33%

Volatility

XHYC vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYC) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) at 1.34%. This indicates that XHYC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XHYCLDRHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

1.34%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

2.04%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.52%

3.89%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.55%

3.62%

+3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.55%

3.62%

+3.93%