XHY.TO vs. ZJK.TO
XHY.TO (iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and ZJK.TO (BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Index ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, XHY.TO returned 2.70%/yr vs 6.26%/yr for ZJK.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XHY.TO vs. ZJK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHY.TO achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than ZJK.TO's 5.30% return.
XHY.TO
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 3.36%
- 3Y*
- 7.33%
- 5Y*
- 2.70%
- 10Y*
- 3.93%
ZJK.TO
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 5.36%
- 1Y
- 10.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.26%
- 10Y*
- —
XHY.TO vs. ZJK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHY.TO iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.22% | 6.33% | 7.05% | 11.06% | -11.10% | 3.51% | 2.65% | 13.83% | -3.89% | -0.08% |
ZJK.TO BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Index ETF | 5.30% | 3.22% | 16.76% | 10.33% | -6.46% | 3.60% | 3.27% | 9.18% | 3.97% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHY.TO and ZJK.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017 | 0.21 |
The correlation between XHY.TO and ZJK.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHY.TO vs. ZJK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XHY.TO
ZJK.TO
XHY.TO vs. ZJK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHY.TO) and BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZJK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XHY.TO | ZJK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.33 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 2.78 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | 8.05 | -3.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XHY.TO vs. ZJK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHY.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, which is greater than ZJK.TO's maximum drawdown of -19.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHY.TO and ZJK.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHY.TO | ZJK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.48% | -19.40% | -9.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -3.69% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.94% | -7.69% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.67% | -14.93% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.56% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.54% | -2.65% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 1.27% | -0.59% |
Volatility
XHY.TO vs. ZJK.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHY.TO) is 1.36%, while BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZJK.TO) has a volatility of 1.76%. This indicates that XHY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZJK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHY.TO | ZJK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 1.76% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.66% | 4.52% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.75% | 5.93% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.66% | 7.82% | +0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.59% | 10.09% | +0.50% |
Dividends
XHY.TO vs. ZJK.TO - Dividend Comparison
XHY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, which matches ZJK.TO's 6.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHY.TO iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 6.13% | 6.04% | 5.87% | 5.56% | 5.70% | 4.72% | 5.18% | 5.38% | 5.87% | 5.46% | 5.64% | 6.83% |
ZJK.TO BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Index ETF | 6.18% | 5.97% | 5.59% | 6.15% | 6.37% | 5.60% | 5.94% | 6.32% | 5.45% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHY.TO and ZJK.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO.
Find the right allocation for XHY.TO and ZJK.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer