XHY.TO vs. ZHY.TO
XHY.TO (iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and ZHY.TO (BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - XHY.TO tracks the Morningstar Gbl HY Bd GR CAD while ZHY.TO tracks the Bloomberg U.S. High Yield Very Liquid Index CAD Hedged. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XHY.TO returned 3.98%/yr vs 3.77%/yr for ZHY.TO. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XHY.TO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for ZHY.TO.
Performance
XHY.TO vs. ZHY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHY.TO achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly higher than ZHY.TO's 0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, XHY.TO has outperformed ZHY.TO with an annualized return of 3.98%, while ZHY.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.77% annualized return.
XHY.TO
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- 3.98%
ZHY.TO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.53%
- 10Y*
- 3.77%
XHY.TO vs. ZHY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHY.TO iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.07% | 6.33% | 7.05% | 11.06% | -11.10% | 3.51% | 2.65% | 13.83% | -3.89% | 5.35% |
ZHY.TO BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 0.71% | 6.27% | 6.04% | 11.48% | -12.80% | 4.03% | 3.31% | 13.45% | -3.88% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHY.TO and ZHY.TO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2010 | 0.56 |
The correlation between XHY.TO and ZHY.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (10 years) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XHY.TO vs. ZHY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHY.TO
ZHY.TO
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
XHY.TO
ZHY.TO
-
Real Estate
XHY.TO
ZHY.TO
-
Basic Materials
XHY.TO
-
ZHY.TO
-
Communication Services
XHY.TO
-
ZHY.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
XHY.TO
-
ZHY.TO
Consumer Defensive
XHY.TO
-
ZHY.TO
-
Energy
XHY.TO
-
ZHY.TO
Financial Services
XHY.TO
-
ZHY.TO
-
Healthcare
XHY.TO
-
ZHY.TO
-
Industrials
XHY.TO
-
ZHY.TO
Technology
XHY.TO
-
ZHY.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHY.TO vs. ZHY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XHY.TO
ZHY.TO
XHY.TO vs. ZHY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHY.TO) and BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZHY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHY.TO | ZHY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.16 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 1.61 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.05 | 6.01 | +1.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHY.TO | ZHY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.87 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.27 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.35 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.45 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
XHY.TO vs. ZHY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHY.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, roughly equal to the maximum ZHY.TO drawdown of -28.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHY.TO and ZHY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHY.TO | ZHY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.48% | -28.44% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -2.96% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.94% | -5.70% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.67% | -17.11% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.48% | -28.44% | -0.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.91% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.55% | -2.86% | +0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 0.79% | -0.13% |
Volatility
XHY.TO vs. ZHY.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHY.TO) is 1.28%, while BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZHY.TO) has a volatility of 1.96%. This indicates that XHY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZHY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHY.TO | ZHY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 1.96% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.55% | 4.11% | -0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.68% | 5.50% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.65% | 9.51% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.62% | 10.92% | -0.30% |
XHY.TO vs. ZHY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHY.TO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than ZHY.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHY.TO vs. ZHY.TO - Dividend Comparison
XHY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, less than ZHY.TO's 6.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHY.TO iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 6.11% | 6.04% | 5.87% | 5.56% | 5.70% | 4.72% | 5.18% | 5.38% | 5.87% | 5.46% | 5.64% | 6.83% |
ZHY.TO BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 6.38% | 6.10% | 6.13% | 6.43% | 6.71% | 5.49% | 6.09% | 6.50% | 6.25% | 6.10% | 5.84% | 7.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHY.TO and ZHY.TO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XHY.TO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XHY.TO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZHY.TO.
XHY.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl HY Bd GR CAD, while ZHY.TO tracks Bloomberg U.S. High Yield Very Liquid Index CAD Hedged. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for XHY.TO and 0.61% for ZHY.TO.
Find the right allocation for XHY.TO and ZHY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer