XHY.TO vs. FLTR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHY.TO) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR).

XHY.TO and FLTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XHY.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl HY Bd GR CAD. It was launched on Jan 21, 2010. FLTR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. It was launched on Apr 25, 2011. Both XHY.TO and FLTR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XHY.TO vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHY.TO) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XHY.TO vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XHY.TO iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	-0.19%	6.33%	7.05%	11.06%	-11.10%	3.51%	2.65%	13.83%	-3.89%	5.35%
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	1.96%	0.40%	16.60%	5.05%	7.92%	-0.36%	-0.27%	0.50%	8.80%	-3.74%

Different Trading Currencies

XHY.TO is traded in CAD, while FLTR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLTR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHY.TO achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 1.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XHY.TO having a 4.34% annualized return and FLTR not far behind at 4.14%.

XHY.TO

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -1.00%
• YTD: -0.19%
• 6M: 0.11%
• 1Y: 4.86%
• 3Y*: 6.89%
• 5Y*: 2.88%
• 10Y*: 4.34%

FLTR

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.56%
• YTD: 1.96%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 1.74%
• 3Y*: 7.45%
• 5Y*: 6.43%
• 10Y*: 4.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHY.TO vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHY.TO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.

XHY.TO

iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

FLTR

VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF

Return for Risk

XHY.TO vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHY.TO

XHY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 42
XHY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
XHY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
XHY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 38
XHY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
XHY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 54

FLTR

FLTR Risk / Return Rank: 91
FLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
FLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHY.TO vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHY.TO) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XHY.TO	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	0.32	+0.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	0.46	+0.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.06	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	0.25	+0.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.63	0.51	+5.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XHY.TO vs. FLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the FLTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHY.TO and FLTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XHY.TO	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77	0.32	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.99	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.53	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.61	-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between XHY.TO and FLTR is -0.30. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

XHY.TO vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

XHY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, more than FLTR's 4.86% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XHY.TO iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	6.14%	6.04%	5.87%	5.56%	5.70%	4.72%	5.18%	5.38%	5.87%	5.46%	5.64%	6.83%
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	4.86%	4.97%	5.93%	6.07%	2.29%	0.63%	1.49%	3.05%	2.67%	1.69%	1.16%	0.71%

Drawdowns

XHY.TO vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHY.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHY.TO and FLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XHY.TO	FLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.48%	-17.84%	-10.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.62%	-1.93%	-2.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.67%	-3.06%	-13.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.48%	-17.84%	-10.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-0.15%	-1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.57%	-0.68%	-1.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	0.26%	+0.68%

Volatility

XHY.TO vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHY.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.49% compared to VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 1.25%. This indicates that XHY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XHY.TO	FLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.49%	1.25%	+1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.36%	3.39%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.38%	5.50%	+0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.64%	6.53%	+2.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.64%	7.89%	+2.75%