PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XHY.TO (iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and NHYB.TO (NBI High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. XHY.TO is passively managed, while NHYB.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XHY.TO returned 2.86%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for NHYB.TO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XHY.TO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for NHYB.TO.

Performance

XHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHY.TO) and NBI High Yield Bond ETF (NHYB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHY.TO achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly higher than NHYB.TO's 0.28% return.

XHY.TO

1D
0.12%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.09%
1Y
4.66%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
3.98%

NHYB.TO

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.28%
6M
0.98%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
7.60%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XHY.TO
iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.07%6.33%7.05%11.06%-11.10%3.51%9.89%
NHYB.TO
NBI High Yield Bond ETF		0.28%7.23%7.06%11.06%-10.24%4.97%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between XHY.TO and NHYB.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2020

0.24

The correlation between XHY.TO and NHYB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XHY.TO
NHYB.TO

Utilities

99.5%

-

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

67.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

32.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

XHY.TO
99.5%
NHYB.TO

-

Real Estate

XHY.TO
0.5%
NHYB.TO

-

Basic Materials

XHY.TO

-

NHYB.TO

-

Communication Services

XHY.TO

-

NHYB.TO
67.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XHY.TO

-

NHYB.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

XHY.TO

-

NHYB.TO

-

Energy

XHY.TO

-

NHYB.TO

-

Financial Services

XHY.TO

-

NHYB.TO
32.1%

Healthcare

XHY.TO

-

NHYB.TO

-

Industrials

XHY.TO

-

NHYB.TO

-

Technology

XHY.TO

-

NHYB.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

NBI High Yield Bond ETF

Often compared with XHY.TO:
XHY.TO vs. XBBXHY.TO vs. XIG.TOXHY.TO vs. CVD.TOXHY.TO vs. XFR.TOXHY.TO vs. HYGXHY.TO vs. XHB.TOXHY.TO vs. FLTR
Often compared with NHYB.TO:
NHYB.TO vs. NSCE.TONHYB.TO vs. EVO.TONHYB.TO vs. NUBF.TONHYB.TO vs. CGHY.TONHYB.TO vs. XSI.TONHYB.TO vs. ZHY.TONHYB.TO vs. CVD.TO

Return for Risk

XHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XHY.TO
XHY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XHY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XHY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
NHYB.TO
NHYB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
NHYB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHYB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHYB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NHYB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHYB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHY.TO) and NBI High Yield Bond ETF (NHYB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XHY.TONHYB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.00
0.73

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.51
1.12

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.14

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.76

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.05

5.94

+1.11

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the NHYB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHY.TO and NHYB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XHY.TONHYB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

0.73

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.44

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.31

+0.19

Drawdowns

XHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHY.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, which is greater than NHYB.TO's maximum drawdown of -21.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHY.TO and NHYB.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XHY.TONHYB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.48%

-21.70%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-2.42%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.94%

-3.80%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

-14.85%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.48%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.55%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-3.02%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

0.72%

-0.06%

Volatility

XHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHY.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to NBI High Yield Bond ETF (NHYB.TO) at 1.11%. This indicates that XHY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NHYB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XHY.TONHYB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

1.11%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.55%

3.88%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.68%

5.86%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.65%

9.09%

-0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.62%

13.84%

-3.22%

XHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHY.TO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than NHYB.TO's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

XHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO - Dividend Comparison

XHY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than NHYB.TO's 5.48% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NHYB.TO
NBI High Yield Bond ETF		5.48%5.53%5.65%6.01%6.23%5.80%3.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XHY.TO
iShares U.S. High Yield Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		6.11%6.04%5.87%5.56%5.70%4.72%5.18%5.38%5.87%5.46%5.64%6.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

XHY.TO and NHYB.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XHY.TO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XHY.TO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for NHYB.TO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and National Bank Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for XHY.TO and 0.68% for NHYB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHY.TO and NHYB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer