PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XHU.TO vs. RUD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XHU.TO vs. RUD.TO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

XHU.TO (iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF) and RUD.TO (RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. XHU.TO is passively managed, while RUD.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, XHU.TO returned 6.86%/yr vs 17.30%/yr for RUD.TO. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XHU.TO charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for RUD.TO.

Performance

XHU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (XHU.TO) and RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XHU.TO having a 10.26% return and RUD.TO slightly higher at 10.54%. Over the past 10 years, XHU.TO has underperformed RUD.TO with an annualized return of 6.86%, while RUD.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.30% annualized return.

XHU.TO

1D
0.38%
1M
1.25%
YTD
10.26%
6M
10.58%
1Y
9.53%
3Y*
10.63%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*
6.86%

RUD.TO

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.01%
YTD
10.54%
6M
6.51%
1Y
22.83%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
17.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XHU.TO
iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF		10.26%-0.30%16.81%-1.38%7.44%23.97%-9.13%13.17%2.81%5.22%
RUD.TO
RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)		10.54%7.35%25.76%23.90%-15.14%54.34%13.61%25.93%6.03%14.39%

Correlation

The correlation between XHU.TO and RUD.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015

0.44

The correlation between XHU.TO and RUD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.45 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XHU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XHU.TO
RUD.TO

Consumer Defensive

24.4%
8.4%

Healthcare

22.5%
8.0%

Energy

20.2%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
13.2%

Utilities

8.1%
3.0%

Communication Services

5.7%
8.4%

Financial Services

4.7%
12.9%

Industrials

3.5%
8.7%

Basic Materials

0.8%
0.5%

Technology

0.2%
31.1%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Consumer Defensive

XHU.TO
24.4%
RUD.TO
8.4%

Healthcare

XHU.TO
22.5%
RUD.TO
8.0%

Energy

XHU.TO
20.2%
RUD.TO
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XHU.TO
9.2%
RUD.TO
13.2%

Utilities

XHU.TO
8.1%
RUD.TO
3.0%

Communication Services

XHU.TO
5.7%
RUD.TO
8.4%

Financial Services

XHU.TO
4.7%
RUD.TO
12.9%

Industrials

XHU.TO
3.5%
RUD.TO
8.7%

Basic Materials

XHU.TO
0.8%
RUD.TO
0.5%

Technology

XHU.TO
0.2%
RUD.TO
31.1%

Real Estate

XHU.TO

-

RUD.TO
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF

RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)

Often compared with XHU.TO:
XHU.TO vs. CUD.TOXHU.TO vs. SCHDXHU.TO vs. VDY.TOXHU.TO vs. XEI.TOXHU.TO vs. XEQT.TOXHU.TO vs. DGROXHU.TO vs. XUS.TO
Often compared with RUD.TO:
RUD.TO vs. VGG.TORUD.TO vs. ZUQ.TORUD.TO vs. ZGQ.TORUD.TO vs. CEW.TORUD.TO vs. FCUV.TORUD.TO vs. XGRO.TORUD.TO vs. QQC.TO

Return for Risk

XHU.TO vs. RUD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XHU.TO
XHU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XHU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XHU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
RUD.TO
RUD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RUD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RUD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
RUD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
RUD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
RUD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (XHU.TO) and RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XHU.TORUD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.58
1.85

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.83
2.53

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.34

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

3.45

-2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.26

12.28

-10.02

XHU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the RUD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHU.TO and RUD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XHU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHU.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum RUD.TO drawdown of -35.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHU.TO and RUD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XHU.TORUD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-35.99%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.16%

-6.65%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.05%

-28.31%

+13.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.05%

-28.31%

+13.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

-35.99%

+3.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.96%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-10.08%

+4.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

1.86%

+2.37%

Volatility

XHU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (XHU.TO) is 2.83%, while RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that XHU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RUD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XHU.TORUD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

3.61%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.53%

9.76%

+5.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.51%

12.42%

+4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.24%

35.34%

-16.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.31%

44.71%

-16.40%

XHU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHU.TO has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than RUD.TO's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

XHU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Dividend Comparison

XHU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than RUD.TO's 1.38% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RUD.TO
RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)		1.38%1.38%3.43%5.24%5.51%3.38%5.73%6.77%7.06%6.23%6.07%7.42%
XHU.TO
iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF		2.45%2.74%2.84%3.00%2.75%2.60%3.33%2.36%2.66%2.37%2.49%2.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

XHU.TO and RUD.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XHU.TO is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XHU.TO is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for RUD.TO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and RBC. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for XHU.TO and 0.43% for RUD.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHU.TO and RUD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer