XHU.TO vs. DXU.TO
XHU.TO (iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF) and DXU.TO (Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XHU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while DXU.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Dynamic. XHU.TO is passively managed, while DXU.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XHU.TO returned 9.20%/yr vs 13.24%/yr for DXU.TO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XHU.TO charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DXU.TO.
Performance
XHU.TO vs. DXU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHU.TO achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly lower than DXU.TO's 21.62% return.
XHU.TO
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- 6M
- 13.23%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 8.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- 6.97%
DXU.TO
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -4.12%
- 6M
- 16.71%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 1Y
- 25.95%
- 3Y*
- 24.33%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- —
XHU.TO vs. DXU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHU.TO iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF | 12.26% | -0.30% | 16.81% | -1.38% | 7.44% | 23.97% | -9.13% | 13.17% | 2.81% | 5.85% |
DXU.TO Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF | 21.62% | 9.36% | 38.05% | 9.43% | -14.91% | 14.93% | 24.17% | 17.48% | 12.64% | 8.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHU.TO and DXU.TO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2017 | 0.25 |
The correlation between XHU.TO and DXU.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XHU.TO vs. DXU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHU.TO
DXU.TO
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Defensive
XHU.TO
DXU.TO
-
Energy
XHU.TO
DXU.TO
Healthcare
XHU.TO
DXU.TO
Financial Services
XHU.TO
DXU.TO
Technology
XHU.TO
DXU.TO
Utilities
XHU.TO
DXU.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XHU.TO
DXU.TO
Communication Services
XHU.TO
DXU.TO
Industrials
XHU.TO
DXU.TO
Basic Materials
XHU.TO
DXU.TO
Real Estate
XHU.TO
-
DXU.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHU.TO vs. DXU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XHU.TO
DXU.TO
XHU.TO vs. DXU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (XHU.TO) and Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF (DXU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XHU.TO | DXU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.25 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 2.85 | -2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | 8.13 | -6.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XHU.TO vs. DXU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHU.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than DXU.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHU.TO and DXU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHU.TO | DXU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -29.23% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.16% | -9.15% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.05% | -23.80% | +8.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.05% | -24.83% | +9.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -6.60% | +5.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -6.63% | +0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.24% | 3.20% | +1.04% |
Volatility
XHU.TO vs. DXU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (XHU.TO) is 5.02%, while Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF (DXU.TO) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that XHU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHU.TO | DXU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 5.32% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 16.03% | -7.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 19.88% | -2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 18.58% | +0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.11% | 19.67% | +8.44% |
XHU.TO vs. DXU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHU.TO has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than DXU.TO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHU.TO vs. DXU.TO - Dividend Comparison
XHU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, while DXU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXU.TO Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XHU.TO iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF | 2.40% | 2.74% | 2.84% | 3.00% | 2.75% | 2.60% | 3.33% | 2.36% | 2.66% | 2.37% | 2.49% | 2.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHU.TO and DXU.TO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XHU.TO is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XHU.TO is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DXU.TO.
XHU.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DXU.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Dynamic. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for XHU.TO and 0.75% for DXU.TO.
Find the right allocation for XHU.TO and DXU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer