XHE vs. XLV
XHE (SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from State Street - XHE tracks the S&P Health Care Equipment Select Industry Index while XLV tracks the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XHE returned 6.02%/yr vs 9.86%/yr for XLV. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XHE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
XHE vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHE achieves a -8.91% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's -2.23% return. Over the past 10 years, XHE has underperformed XLV with an annualized return of 6.02%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.86% annualized return.
XHE
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -8.91%
- 6M
- -10.99%
- 1Y
- 1.37%
- 3Y*
- -5.83%
- 5Y*
- -8.97%
- 10Y*
- 6.02%
XLV
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- -2.23%
- 6M
- -2.55%
- 1Y
- 15.69%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
XHE vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHE SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF | -8.91% | -0.23% | 5.08% | -6.23% | -23.34% | 3.04% | 32.91% | 22.30% | 8.90% | 30.51% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -2.23% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHE and XLV is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011 | 0.67 |
The correlation between XHE and XLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
XHE vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHE
XLV
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
XHE
XLV
Financial Services
XHE
XLV
-
Industrials
XHE
XLV
-
Communication Services
XHE
XLV
-
Basic Materials
XHE
-
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
XHE
-
XLV
-
Consumer Defensive
XHE
-
XLV
-
Energy
XHE
-
XLV
-
Real Estate
XHE
-
XLV
-
Technology
XHE
-
XLV
-
Utilities
XHE
-
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHE vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
XHE
XLV
XHE vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF (XHE) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XHE | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.19 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 1.51 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.16 | 3.56 | -3.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XHE vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHE drawdown since its inception was -49.92%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHE and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHE | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.92% | -39.17% | -10.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.29% | -10.47% | -7.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.62% | -17.11% | -15.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.92% | -17.11% | -32.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.92% | -28.40% | -21.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.61% | -5.53% | -34.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.34% | -7.12% | -6.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.42% | 4.42% | +4.00% |
Volatility
XHE vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF (XHE) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 5.14%. This indicates that XHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHE | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.40% | 5.14% | +2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.50% | 10.58% | +5.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.12% | 15.06% | +7.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.56% | 14.76% | +9.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 16.59% | +6.41% |
XHE vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHE vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
XHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than XLV's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHE SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.09% | 0.78% | 0.17% | 7.22% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.69% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHE and XLV have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XHE has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to XLV (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHE dropped -49.92% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, XLV leads with 9.86% vs 6.02% for XHE. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLV has performed better with a 9.86% return vs 6.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHE.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.09% for XHE.
XHE tracks S&P Health Care Equipment Select Industry Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHE and 0.08% for XLV.
XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XHE and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer