XHE vs. PSIL

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

XHE (SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF) and PSIL (AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. XHE is passively managed, while PSIL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XHE returned -0.09%/yr vs 12.28%/yr for PSIL. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XHE charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for PSIL.

Performance

XHE vs. PSIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF (XHE) and AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHE achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly lower than PSIL's 36.69% return.

XHE

• 1D: 4.05%
• 1M: 6.04%
• 6M: 7.88%
• YTD: 5.60%
• 1Y: 21.90%
• 3Y*: -0.09%
• 5Y*: -6.21%
• 10Y*: 6.33%
• ALL TIME*: 9.68%

PSIL

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.03%
• 6M: 36.69%
• YTD: 36.69%
• 1Y: 60.21%
• 3Y*: 12.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -23.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF	$654.91K	$1.18M	$921.76K
XHE SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF	$2.26M	$2.20M	$2.39M

XHE vs. PSIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XHE SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF	5.60%	-0.23%	5.08%	-6.23%	-23.34%	-9.91%
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF	36.69%	74.55%	-19.50%	-25.12%	-67.24%	-42.72%

Correlation

The correlation between XHE and PSIL is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021	0.41

The correlation between XHE and PSIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XHE vs. PSIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XHE	PSIL
Healthcare	98.8%	100.0%
Technology	1.7%	-
Industrials	1.7%	-
Communication Services	1.5%	-
Financial Services	1.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XHE vs. PSIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XHE

XHE Risk / Return Rank: 35
XHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
XHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
XHE Omega Ratio Rank: 35
XHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
XHE Martin Ratio Rank: 29

PSIL

PSIL Risk / Return Rank: 58
PSIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
PSIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
PSIL Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PSIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
PSIL Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XHE vs. PSIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF (XHE) and AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XHE	PSIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	1.49	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	2.11	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.25	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	2.97	-1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.55	6.17	-3.62

XHE vs. PSIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHE Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the PSIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHE and PSIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XHE vs. PSIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHE drawdown since its inception was -49.92%, smaller than the maximum PSIL drawdown of -92.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHE and PSIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	XHE	PSIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.92%	-92.72%	+42.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.29%	-20.38%	+2.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.66%	-61.25%	+32.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.99%	-73.41%	+43.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.50%	-76.63%	+63.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.61%	9.78%	-1.17%

Volatility

XHE vs. PSIL - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF (XHE) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) at 7.82%. This indicates that XHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XHE	PSIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.23%	7.82%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.07%	29.44%	-11.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.01%	40.59%	-17.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.83%	62.52%	-37.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.14%	62.52%	-39.38%

XHE vs. PSIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PSIL's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

XHE vs. PSIL - Dividend Comparison

XHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than PSIL's 7.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF	7.26%	10.95%	1.49%	0.24%	2.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XHE SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF	0.06%	0.08%	0.04%	0.03%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	0.09%	0.78%	0.17%	7.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XHE and PSIL in my portfolio?

XHE and PSIL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XHE or PSIL?

XHE has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to PSIL (7.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHE dropped -49.92% vs PSIL's -92.72%.

Which ETF is better, XHE or PSIL?

On 3-year performance, PSIL leads with 12.28% vs -0.09% for XHE. On fees, XHE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PSIL has been the lower-risk option at 7.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XHE or PSIL?

Over the 3-year period, PSIL has performed better with a 12.28% return vs -0.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XHE or PSIL?

XHE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for PSIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XHE or PSIL?

PSIL has the higher dividend yield at 7.26%, compared with 0.06% for XHE.

What is the main difference between XHE and PSIL?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHE and 1.00% for PSIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.