XHE vs. PBPH
XHE (SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XHE tracks the S&P Health Care Equipment Select Industry Index while PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XHE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
XHE vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHE achieves a -11.59% return, which is significantly lower than PBPH's -1.70% return.
XHE
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- YTD
- -11.59%
- 6M
- -10.52%
- 1Y
- -2.63%
- 3Y*
- -6.57%
- 5Y*
- -8.01%
- 10Y*
- 5.72%
PBPH
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -1.70%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XHE vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XHE SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF | -11.59% | -1.49% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | -1.70% | 0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHE and PBPH is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHE vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
XHE
PBPH
XHE vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF (XHE) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHE | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHE | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | -0.11 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
XHE vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHE drawdown since its inception was -49.92%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHE and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHE | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.92% | -11.10% | -38.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.39% | -9.22% | -32.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -4.20% | -9.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.00% | — | — |
Volatility
XHE vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHE | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.38% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.39% | 16.83% | +4.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 16.83% | +7.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 16.83% | +6.10% |
XHE vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHE vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
XHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, which matches PBPH's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XHE SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF | 0.09% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.09% | 0.78% | 0.17% | 7.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHE and PBPH have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHE.
XHE and PBPH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.09%.
XHE tracks S&P Health Care Equipment Select Industry Index, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHE and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for XHE and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer