XHE vs. PBPH
XHE (SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XHE tracks the S&P Health Care Equipment Select Industry Index while PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XHE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
XHE vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHE achieves a -7.82% return, which is significantly lower than PBPH's 2.63% return.
XHE
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- -7.82%
- 6M
- -9.00%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- -5.45%
- 5Y*
- -8.83%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
PBPH
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XHE vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XHE SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF | -7.82% | 0.88% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 2.63% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHE and PBPH is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHE vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
XHE
PBPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XHE vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF (XHE) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XHE | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.32 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XHE vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHE drawdown since its inception was -49.92%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHE and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHE | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.92% | -11.10% | -38.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.89% | -5.21% | -33.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.35% | -4.36% | -8.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.46% | — | — |
Volatility
XHE vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHE | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.11% | 17.07% | +5.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.56% | 17.07% | +7.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.99% | 17.07% | +5.92% |
XHE vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHE vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
XHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than PBPH's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XHE SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.09% | 0.78% | 0.17% | 7.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHE and PBPH have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHE.
PBPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.06% for XHE.
XHE tracks S&P Health Care Equipment Select Industry Index, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHE and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for XHE and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer