XHE vs. GLDM
XHE (SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - XHE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P Health Care Equipment Select Industry Index, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XHE returned -8.01%/yr vs 18.99%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XHE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.
Performance
XHE vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHE achieves a -11.59% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 3.99% return.
XHE
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- YTD
- -11.59%
- 6M
- -10.52%
- 1Y
- -2.63%
- 3Y*
- -6.57%
- 5Y*
- -8.01%
- 10Y*
- 5.72%
GLDM
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -2.66%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 32.55%
- 3Y*
- 31.91%
- 5Y*
- 18.99%
- 10Y*
- —
XHE vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHE SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF | -11.59% | -0.23% | 5.08% | -6.23% | -23.34% | 3.04% | 32.91% | 22.30% | -12.15% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 3.99% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHE and GLDM is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018 | 0.08 |
XHE vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHE
GLDM
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
XHE
GLDM
-
Industrials
XHE
GLDM
-
Financial Services
XHE
GLDM
-
Communication Services
XHE
GLDM
-
Basic Materials
XHE
-
GLDM
Consumer Cyclical
XHE
-
GLDM
-
Consumer Defensive
XHE
-
GLDM
-
Energy
XHE
-
GLDM
-
Real Estate
XHE
-
GLDM
-
Technology
XHE
-
GLDM
-
Utilities
XHE
-
GLDM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHE vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
XHE
GLDM
XHE vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF (XHE) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHE | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | 1.24 | -1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | 1.64 | -1.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.25 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 1.88 | -2.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | 4.74 | -5.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHE | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 1.24 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | 1.07 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 1.03 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
XHE vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHE drawdown since its inception was -49.92%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHE and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHE | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.92% | -21.63% | -28.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.29% | -19.14% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.62% | -19.14% | -13.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.92% | -20.92% | -29.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.39% | -16.85% | -24.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -6.21% | -7.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.00% | 7.61% | +0.39% |
Volatility
XHE vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF (XHE) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) have volatilities of 5.82% and 5.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHE | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 5.74% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.38% | 22.98% | -7.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.39% | 26.49% | -5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 17.92% | +6.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 16.85% | +6.08% |
XHE vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHE vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
XHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XHE SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF | 0.09% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.09% | 0.78% | 0.17% | 7.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHE and GLDM have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XHE has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to GLDM (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHE dropped -49.92% vs GLDM's -21.63%.
On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.99% vs -8.01% for XHE. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.99% return vs -8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHE.
XHE has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.
XHE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while GLDM is Gold. XHE tracks S&P Health Care Equipment Select Industry Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHE and 0.10% for GLDM.
GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XHE and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer