PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XHD.TO vs. ZLH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XHD.TO vs. ZLH.TO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

XHD.TO (iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and ZLH.TO (BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, XHD.TO returned 5.65%/yr vs 7.32%/yr for ZLH.TO. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XHD.TO charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZLH.TO.

Performance

XHD.TO vs. ZLH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHD.TO) and BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHD.TO achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly higher than ZLH.TO's 8.99% return. Over the past 10 years, XHD.TO has underperformed ZLH.TO with an annualized return of 5.65%, while ZLH.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.32% annualized return.

XHD.TO

1D
-0.30%
1M
4.54%
6M
11.52%
YTD
16.33%
1Y
7.15%
3Y*
8.69%
5Y*
6.78%
10Y*
5.65%

ZLH.TO

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.07%
6M
6.09%
YTD
8.99%
1Y
8.78%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
7.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHD.TO vs. ZLH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XHD.TO
iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		16.33%-1.36%9.56%0.00%4.27%17.97%-9.44%18.01%-5.54%11.80%
ZLH.TO
BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF		8.99%5.90%10.95%-2.11%0.20%22.07%2.34%25.20%-1.85%11.93%

Correlation

The correlation between XHD.TO and ZLH.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2016

0.63

The correlation between XHD.TO and ZLH.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

XHD.TO vs. ZLH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XHD.TO
ZLH.TO

Consumer Defensive

24.5%
12.4%

Healthcare

23.7%
17.8%

Energy

19.6%
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
3.2%

Utilities

8.2%
20.7%

Communication Services

5.2%
3.0%

Financial Services

4.8%
11.7%

Industrials

3.6%
6.3%

Basic Materials

0.8%
2.2%

Technology

0.2%
18.7%

Real Estate

-

3.4%

Consumer Defensive

XHD.TO
24.5%
ZLH.TO
12.4%

Healthcare

XHD.TO
23.7%
ZLH.TO
17.8%

Energy

XHD.TO
19.6%
ZLH.TO
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XHD.TO
9.2%
ZLH.TO
3.2%

Utilities

XHD.TO
8.2%
ZLH.TO
20.7%

Communication Services

XHD.TO
5.2%
ZLH.TO
3.0%

Financial Services

XHD.TO
4.8%
ZLH.TO
11.7%

Industrials

XHD.TO
3.6%
ZLH.TO
6.3%

Basic Materials

XHD.TO
0.8%
ZLH.TO
2.2%

Technology

XHD.TO
0.2%
ZLH.TO
18.7%

Real Estate

XHD.TO

-

ZLH.TO
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF

Often compared with XHD.TO:
XHD.TO vs. SCHDXHD.TO vs. VDY.TOXHD.TO vs. XDIV.TOXHD.TO vs. XEQT.TOXHD.TO vs. XDGH.TOXHD.TO vs. XDU.TOXHD.TO vs. HDIVX
Often compared with ZLH.TO:
ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TOZLH.TO vs. TULV.TOZLH.TO vs. ZLU.TOZLH.TO vs. XTOT.TOZLH.TO vs. TPU.TOZLH.TO vs. XMS.TOZLH.TO vs. SMVP.TO

Return for Risk

XHD.TO vs. ZLH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XHD.TO
XHD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XHD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XHD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
ZLH.TO
ZLH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ZLH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHD.TO vs. ZLH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHD.TO) and BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XHD.TOZLH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.44
0.81

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.64
1.11

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.16

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

1.20

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.22

2.90

-0.68

XHD.TO vs. ZLH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the ZLH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHD.TO and ZLH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XHD.TO vs. ZLH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHD.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, which is greater than ZLH.TO's maximum drawdown of -33.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHD.TO and ZLH.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XHD.TOZLH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-33.34%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.29%

-7.35%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.74%

-10.17%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.37%

-14.66%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

-33.34%

-5.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-2.20%

+1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-3.90%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

3.04%

+0.19%

Volatility

XHD.TO vs. ZLH.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHD.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLH.TO) at 3.96%. This indicates that XHD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZLH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XHD.TOZLH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

3.96%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

7.88%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

10.88%

+5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.69%

12.29%

+2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.42%

13.84%

+2.58%

XHD.TO vs. ZLH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHD.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than ZLH.TO's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

XHD.TO vs. ZLH.TO - Dividend Comparison

XHD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than ZLH.TO's 1.74% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XHD.TO
iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.35%2.74%3.06%3.16%2.75%2.87%3.51%2.51%2.87%2.41%2.54%3.07%
ZLH.TO
BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF		1.74%1.92%2.25%2.45%2.12%1.84%1.95%1.55%2.00%1.93%2.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XHD.TO and ZLH.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZLH.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZLH.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for XHD.TO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for XHD.TO and 0.30% for ZLH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHD.TO and ZLH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer