XHD.TO vs. CDIV.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XHD.TO (iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and CDIV.TO (Manulife Smart Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XHD.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while CDIV.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Manulife. XHD.TO is passively managed, while CDIV.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XHD.TO returned 6.55%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for CDIV.TO. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XHD.TO charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CDIV.TO.

Performance

XHD.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHD.TO) and Manulife Smart Dividend ETF (CDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHD.TO achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly lower than CDIV.TO's 14.31% return.

XHD.TO

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 11.94%
• 6M: 5.51%
• 1Y: 11.69%
• 3Y*: 9.73%
• 5Y*: 6.55%
• 10Y*: 6.22%

CDIV.TO

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 14.31%
• 6M: 10.66%
• 1Y: 31.29%
• 3Y*: 20.24%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHD.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XHD.TO iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	11.94%	3.92%	9.50%	-0.07%	4.22%	17.88%	0.45%
CDIV.TO Manulife Smart Dividend ETF	14.31%	25.88%	15.23%	11.77%	-2.50%	26.20%	2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XHD.TO and CDIV.TO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2020	0.58

The correlation between XHD.TO and CDIV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XHD.TO vs. CDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHD.TO

XHD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 30
XHD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
XHD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
XHD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 28
XHD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
XHD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 33

CDIV.TO

CDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 81
CDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
CDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
CDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
CDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHD.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHD.TO) and Manulife Smart Dividend ETF (CDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XHD.TO	CDIV.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	2.61	-1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	3.21	-1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.53	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	4.20	-2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.11	17.38	-12.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XHD.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the CDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHD.TO and CDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XHD.TO	CDIV.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	2.61	-1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	1.13	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	1.40	-0.87

Drawdowns

XHD.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHD.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, which is greater than CDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHD.TO and CDIV.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XHD.TO	CDIV.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.71%	-16.44%	-22.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.51%	-7.48%	+0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.75%	-9.64%	-3.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.38%	-16.44%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-0.55%	-1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.93%	-2.83%	-1.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.29%	1.81%	+0.48%

Volatility

XHD.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHD.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Manulife Smart Dividend ETF (CDIV.TO) at 2.82%. This indicates that XHD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XHD.TO	CDIV.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	2.82%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.40%	10.70%	-1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.28%	12.05%	-0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.03%	12.05%	+0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.53%	11.90%	+3.63%

XHD.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHD.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than CDIV.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

XHD.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

XHD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than CDIV.TO's 2.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDIV.TO Manulife Smart Dividend ETF	2.28%	3.02%	3.41%	3.45%	3.41%	2.38%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XHD.TO iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	2.38%	2.61%	2.99%	3.09%	2.69%	2.81%	3.44%	2.46%	2.81%	2.36%	2.48%	3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XHD.TO and CDIV.TO in my portfolio?

XHD.TO and CDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XHD.TO or CDIV.TO?

On fees, CDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XHD.TO or CDIV.TO?

CDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for XHD.TO.

What is the main difference between XHD.TO and CDIV.TO?

XHD.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CDIV.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Manulife. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for XHD.TO and 0.28% for CDIV.TO.