PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XHC.TO vs. XEG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XHC.TO vs. XEG.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XHC.TO (iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and XEG.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XHC.TO is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while XEG.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XHC.TO returned 6.87%/yr vs 11.85%/yr for XEG.TO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XHC.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for XEG.TO.

Performance

XHC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHC.TO achieves a -5.65% return, which is significantly lower than XEG.TO's 44.34% return. Over the past 10 years, XHC.TO has underperformed XEG.TO with an annualized return of 6.87%, while XEG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.85% annualized return.

XHC.TO

1D
0.59%
1M
0.77%
YTD
-5.65%
6M
-5.54%
1Y
7.72%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
6.87%

XEG.TO

1D
1.17%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
44.34%
6M
39.73%
1Y
70.40%
3Y*
28.08%
5Y*
29.48%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XHC.TO
iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		-5.65%10.91%1.22%2.14%-3.56%21.32%8.71%22.47%2.20%16.84%
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF		44.34%16.72%14.08%3.52%53.25%83.71%-34.41%8.98%-27.05%-11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between XHC.TO and XEG.TO is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011

0.24

The correlation between XHC.TO and XEG.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XHC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XHC.TO
XEG.TO

Healthcare

97.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

XHC.TO
97.4%
XEG.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

XHC.TO
0.5%
XEG.TO

-

Basic Materials

XHC.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Communication Services

XHC.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

XHC.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Energy

XHC.TO

-

XEG.TO
100.0%

Financial Services

XHC.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Industrials

XHC.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Real Estate

XHC.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Technology

XHC.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Utilities

XHC.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF

Often compared with XHC.TO:
XHC.TO vs. XLVXHC.TO vs. VHTXHC.TO vs. TDOCXHC.TO vs. LIFE.TOXHC.TO vs. XST.TOXHC.TO vs. IHIXHC.TO vs. ZUH.TO
Often compared with XEG.TO:
XEG.TO vs. XLEXEG.TO vs. XEQT.TOXEG.TO vs. CNQ.TOXEG.TO vs. HXE.TOXEG.TO vs. ZEO.TOXEG.TO vs. XDIV.TOXEG.TO vs. XCG.TO

Return for Risk

XHC.TO vs. XEG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XHC.TO
XHC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XHC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XHC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
XEG.TO
XEG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XHC.TOXEG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.54
3.11

-2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.91
3.66

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.49

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

6.36

-5.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.76

19.02

-17.26

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XHC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHC.TO and XEG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XHC.TOXEG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

3.11

-2.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

1.04

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.36

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.28

+0.39

Drawdowns

XHC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHC.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.28%, smaller than the maximum XEG.TO drawdown of -87.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHC.TO and XEG.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XHC.TOXEG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.28%

-87.74%

+60.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-11.12%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

-25.67%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.81%

-28.42%

+9.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.28%

-79.66%

+52.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.76%

-4.00%

-5.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-29.19%

+24.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

3.71%

+0.68%

Volatility

XHC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) is 4.76%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) has a volatility of 9.31%. This indicates that XHC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XHC.TOXEG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

9.31%

-4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

18.99%

-8.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

22.76%

-8.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.87%

28.62%

-14.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.75%

33.41%

-17.66%

XHC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHC.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than XEG.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

XHC.TO vs. XEG.TO - Dividend Comparison

XHC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than XEG.TO's 2.65% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF		2.65%3.63%3.46%4.26%3.31%1.64%2.96%2.70%2.25%1.41%1.40%3.58%
XHC.TO
iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.98%1.87%4.42%2.38%0.84%0.79%0.96%1.07%1.68%1.14%1.63%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

XHC.TO and XEG.TO have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEG.TO is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEG.TO is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for XHC.TO.

XHC.TO is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XEG.TO is Energy Equities. XHC.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while XEG.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for XHC.TO and 0.61% for XEG.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHC.TO and XEG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer