XHC.TO vs. VFV.TO
XHC.TO (iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and VFV.TO (Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XHC.TO is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while VFV.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XHC.TO returned 6.87%/yr vs 16.04%/yr for VFV.TO. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XHC.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFV.TO.
Performance
XHC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHC.TO achieves a -5.65% return, which is significantly lower than VFV.TO's 12.30% return. Over the past 10 years, XHC.TO has underperformed VFV.TO with an annualized return of 6.87%, while VFV.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.04% annualized return.
XHC.TO
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- -5.65%
- 6M
- -5.54%
- 1Y
- 7.72%
- 3Y*
- 2.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.54%
- 10Y*
- 6.87%
VFV.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.57%
- 5Y*
- 16.84%
- 10Y*
- 16.04%
XHC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHC.TO iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -5.65% | 10.91% | 1.22% | 2.14% | -3.56% | 21.32% | 8.71% | 22.47% | 2.20% | 16.84% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 12.30% | 12.18% | 35.23% | 23.23% | -12.58% | 27.51% | 15.62% | 25.14% | 2.94% | 13.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHC.TO and VFV.TO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2012 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XHC.TO and VFV.TO has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XHC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHC.TO
VFV.TO
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
XHC.TO
VFV.TO
Consumer Defensive
XHC.TO
VFV.TO
Basic Materials
XHC.TO
-
VFV.TO
Communication Services
XHC.TO
-
VFV.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XHC.TO
-
VFV.TO
Energy
XHC.TO
-
VFV.TO
Financial Services
XHC.TO
-
VFV.TO
Industrials
XHC.TO
-
VFV.TO
Real Estate
XHC.TO
-
VFV.TO
Technology
XHC.TO
-
VFV.TO
Utilities
XHC.TO
-
VFV.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHC.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XHC.TO
VFV.TO
XHC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHC.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.48 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 3.44 | -2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.76 | 13.10 | -11.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHC.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 2.59 | -2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 1.14 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.97 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.14 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
XHC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHC.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.28%, roughly equal to the maximum VFV.TO drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHC.TO and VFV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHC.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.28% | -27.43% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -8.62% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.81% | -19.05% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.81% | -22.19% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.28% | -27.43% | +0.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.76% | -0.18% | -9.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -3.35% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 2.26% | +2.13% |
Volatility
XHC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) at 3.05%. This indicates that XHC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHC.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 3.05% | +1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 8.55% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.34% | 11.46% | +2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.87% | 14.91% | -1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 16.57% | -0.82% |
XHC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHC.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison
XHC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than VFV.TO's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.83% | 0.92% | 0.99% | 1.20% | 1.31% | 1.06% | 1.33% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.66% | 1.63% |
XHC.TO iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.98% | 1.87% | 4.42% | 2.38% | 0.84% | 0.79% | 0.96% | 1.07% | 1.68% | 1.14% | 1.63% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHC.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for XHC.TO.
XHC.TO is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. XHC.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for XHC.TO and 0.09% for VFV.TO.
Find the right allocation for XHC.TO and VFV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer