XHC.TO vs. HIG.TO
XHC.TO (iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and HIG.TO (Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. XHC.TO is passively managed, while HIG.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, XHC.TO returned 7.17%/yr vs 5.34%/yr for HIG.TO. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
XHC.TO vs. HIG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHC.TO achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly higher than HIG.TO's -2.36% return. Over the past 10 years, XHC.TO has outperformed HIG.TO with an annualized return of 7.17%, while HIG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.34% annualized return.
XHC.TO
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 5.64%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- 17.24%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.17%
HIG.TO
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- 6M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- -2.36%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
XHC.TO vs. HIG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHC.TO iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 2.94% | 10.91% | 1.22% | 2.14% | -3.57% | 17.32% | 8.71% | 22.47% | 2.20% | 16.83% |
HIG.TO Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF | -2.36% | 13.94% | -0.33% | -1.53% | -14.75% | 24.68% | 5.06% | 24.08% | 5.65% | 7.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHC.TO and HIG.TO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, XHC.TO and HIG.TO have become more correlated (0.81) than their long-term average of 0.58, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHC.TO vs. HIG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XHC.TO
HIG.TO
XHC.TO vs. HIG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF (HIG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XHC.TO | HIG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.11 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 0.60 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 1.41 | +2.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XHC.TO vs. HIG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHC.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.28%, smaller than the maximum HIG.TO drawdown of -31.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHC.TO and HIG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHC.TO | HIG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.28% | -31.83% | +4.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -14.18% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.81% | -14.18% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.81% | -24.58% | +5.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.28% | -31.83% | +4.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | -6.98% | +4.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -8.17% | +3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 6.03% | -1.49% |
Volatility
XHC.TO vs. HIG.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF (HIG.TO) have volatilities of 6.11% and 6.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHC.TO | HIG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 6.38% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.82% | 11.19% | +0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.53% | 14.80% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 15.17% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 17.37% | -1.52% |
Dividends
XHC.TO vs. HIG.TO - Dividend Comparison
XHC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than HIG.TO's 8.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIG.TO Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF | 8.91% | 8.32% | 8.71% | 8.03% | 6.97% | 5.29% | 6.22% | 6.12% | 7.11% | 6.43% | 6.47% | 1.80% |
XHC.TO iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.88% | 1.87% | 4.42% | 2.38% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 0.97% | 1.07% | 1.68% | 1.14% | 1.63% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHC.TO and HIG.TO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Brompton.
Find the right allocation for XHC.TO and HIG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer