PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHC.TO vs. FHH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHC.TO vs. FHH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Health Care Sector Index ETF (FHH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHC.TO achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly lower than FHH.TO's 9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, XHC.TO has underperformed FHH.TO with an annualized return of 7.17%, while FHH.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.42% annualized return.


XHC.TO

1D
1.91%
1M
5.64%
6M
1.00%
YTD
2.94%
1Y
17.24%
3Y*
6.27%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
7.17%

FHH.TO

1D
-2.10%
1M
4.64%
6M
6.33%
YTD
9.08%
1Y
25.19%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
8.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHC.TO vs. FHH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XHC.TO
iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
2.94%10.91%1.22%2.14%-3.57%17.32%8.71%22.47%2.20%16.83%
FHH.TO
First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Health Care Sector Index ETF
9.08%5.83%9.13%-6.00%-8.34%22.83%23.20%16.76%4.25%12.14%

Correlation

The correlation between XHC.TO and FHH.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2014

0.26

Over the past year, the correlation between XHC.TO and FHH.TO has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHC.TO vs. FHH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHC.TO
XHC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
XHC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XHC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FHH.TO
FHH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FHH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FHH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHC.TO vs. FHH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Health Care Sector Index ETF (FHH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XHC.TOFHH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.80

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.81

4.88

-1.08

XHC.TO vs. FHH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the FHH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHC.TO and FHH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XHC.TO vs. FHH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHC.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.28%, which is greater than FHH.TO's maximum drawdown of -25.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHC.TO and FHH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHC.TOFHH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.28%

-25.83%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-12.91%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

-20.20%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.81%

-21.86%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.28%

-23.58%

-3.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-4.65%

+2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-8.37%

+3.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.54%

4.76%

-0.22%

Volatility

XHC.TO vs. FHH.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Health Care Sector Index ETF (FHH.TO) at 5.58%. This indicates that XHC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHC.TOFHH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

5.58%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.82%

11.85%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

16.59%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.24%

15.99%

-1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.85%

16.71%

-0.86%

Dividends

XHC.TO vs. FHH.TO - Dividend Comparison

XHC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than FHH.TO's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHH.TO
First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Health Care Sector Index ETF
0.59%0.12%0.22%0.23%0.39%5.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XHC.TO
iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
1.88%1.87%4.42%2.38%0.84%0.80%0.97%1.07%1.68%1.14%1.63%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHC.TO and FHH.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XHC.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while FHH.TO tracks StrataQuant Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHC.TO and FHH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer