XGVC.DE vs. XDWH.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XGVC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE).
XGVC.DE and XDWH.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGVC.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the FTSE ESG Select World Government Bond Developed Markets. It was launched on Jun 15, 2022. XDWH.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Mar 4, 2016. Both XGVC.DE and XDWH.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XGVC.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XGVC.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGVC.DE Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF | 0.30% | -4.28% | 1.61% | 2.49% | -5.86% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -2.43% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | 3.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGVC.DE achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's -2.43% return.
XGVC.DE
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- -2.99%
- 3Y*
- -0.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -3.56%
- YTD
- -2.43%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- 1Y
- 0.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.43%
- 5Y*
- 5.79%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XGVC.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGVC.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XGVC.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XGVC.DE
XDWH.DE
XGVC.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XGVC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGVC.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | 0.01 | -0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | 0.12 | -1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.02 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 0.22 | -0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 0.51 | -1.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGVC.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | 0.01 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.56 | -0.81 |
Correlation
The correlation between XGVC.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XGVC.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGVC.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XGVC.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGVC.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.47%, smaller than the maximum XDWH.DE drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGVC.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGVC.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.47% | -26.08% | +10.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.54% | -11.72% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.39% | -8.93% | -3.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.72% | -4.72% | -6.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 3.74% | -0.52% |
Volatility
XGVC.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XGVC.DE) is 1.51%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that XGVC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XGVC.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 3.99% | -2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.61% | 8.45% | -5.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.29% | 16.42% | -12.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.27% | 13.28% | -7.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.27% | 14.71% | -8.44% |