XGVC.DE vs. SPFV.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XGVC.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (SPFV.DE).
XGVC.DE and SPFV.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGVC.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the FTSE ESG Select World Government Bond Developed Markets. It was launched on Jun 15, 2022. SPFV.DE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (USD Hedged). It was launched on Oct 9, 2019. Both XGVC.DE and SPFV.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XGVC.DE vs. SPFV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XGVC.DE vs. SPFV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGVC.DE Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF | 0.30% | -4.28% | 1.61% | 2.49% | -5.86% |
SPFV.DE SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) | 1.98% | -7.02% | 9.30% | 3.44% | -3.20% |
Different Trading Currencies
XGVC.DE is traded in EUR, while SPFV.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPFV.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGVC.DE achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than SPFV.DE's 1.98% return.
XGVC.DE
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- -2.99%
- 3Y*
- -0.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPFV.DE
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- -2.76%
- 3Y*
- 1.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XGVC.DE vs. SPFV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGVC.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPFV.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XGVC.DE vs. SPFV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XGVC.DE
SPFV.DE
XGVC.DE vs. SPFV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XGVC.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (SPFV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGVC.DE | SPFV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | -0.37 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | -0.45 | -0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.94 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | -0.20 | -0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | -0.30 | -0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGVC.DE | SPFV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | -0.37 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.03 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between XGVC.DE and SPFV.DE is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XGVC.DE vs. SPFV.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGVC.DE nor SPFV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XGVC.DE vs. SPFV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGVC.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.47%, which is greater than SPFV.DE's maximum drawdown of -11.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGVC.DE and SPFV.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGVC.DE | SPFV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.47% | -15.26% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.54% | -2.35% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.39% | -1.44% | -10.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.72% | -4.71% | -6.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 0.71% | +2.51% |
Volatility
XGVC.DE vs. SPFV.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XGVC.DE) is 1.51%, while SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (SPFV.DE) has a volatility of 2.27%. This indicates that XGVC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPFV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XGVC.DE | SPFV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 2.27% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.61% | 4.30% | -1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.29% | 7.43% | -3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.27% | 7.91% | -1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.27% | 7.66% | -1.39% |