XGVC.DE vs. XBAE.DE
XGVC.DE (Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF) and XBAE.DE (Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 5C EUR hedged) are both Global Bonds funds from Xtrackers - XGVC.DE tracks the FTSE ESG Select World Government Bond Developed Markets while XBAE.DE tracks the Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate Sustainable and SRI Currency Neutral (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XGVC.DE returned -0.19%/yr vs 1.72%/yr for XBAE.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XGVC.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for XBAE.DE.
Performance
XGVC.DE vs. XBAE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGVC.DE achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly higher than XBAE.DE's -0.55% return.
XGVC.DE
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- -0.16%
- 1Y
- -1.01%
- 3Y*
- -0.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBAE.DE
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- -0.54%
- 1Y
- 1.07%
- 3Y*
- 1.72%
- 5Y*
- -1.74%
- 10Y*
- -0.46%
XGVC.DE vs. XBAE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGVC.DE Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF | 0.30% | -4.28% | 1.61% | 2.49% | -5.86% |
XBAE.DE Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 5C EUR hedged | -0.55% | 2.65% | 0.52% | 4.36% | -3.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGVC.DE and XBAE.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2022 | 0.73 |
The correlation between XGVC.DE and XBAE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGVC.DE vs. XBAE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XGVC.DE
XBAE.DE
XGVC.DE vs. XBAE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XGVC.DE) and Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 5C EUR hedged (XBAE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGVC.DE | XBAE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.05 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 0.30 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 0.83 | -1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGVC.DE | XBAE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 | 0.27 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | 0.08 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
XGVC.DE vs. XBAE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGVC.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.47%, smaller than the maximum XBAE.DE drawdown of -19.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGVC.DE and XBAE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGVC.DE | XBAE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.47% | -19.04% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.66% | -3.11% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.10% | -4.58% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.39% | -10.88% | -1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.81% | -5.91% | -4.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.42% | 1.11% | +0.31% |
Volatility
XGVC.DE vs. XBAE.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XGVC.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.54% compared to Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 5C EUR hedged (XBAE.DE) at 1.32%. This indicates that XGVC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBAE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGVC.DE | XBAE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 1.32% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.05% | 2.86% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 3.46% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.22% | 5.00% | +1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.22% | 4.63% | +1.59% |
XGVC.DE vs. XBAE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGVC.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XBAE.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XGVC.DE vs. XBAE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGVC.DE nor XBAE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XGVC.DE and XBAE.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBAE.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBAE.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XGVC.DE.
XGVC.DE tracks FTSE ESG Select World Government Bond Developed Markets, while XBAE.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate Sustainable and SRI Currency Neutral (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XGVC.DE and 0.10% for XBAE.DE.
Find the right allocation for XGVC.DE and XBAE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer