PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGVC.DE vs. VAGF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGVC.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XGVC.DE) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (VAGF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGVC.DE achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly higher than VAGF.DE's -0.68% return.


XGVC.DE

1D
0.21%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.30%
6M
-0.16%
1Y
-1.01%
3Y*
-0.19%
5Y*
10Y*

VAGF.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
-0.68%
6M
-0.37%
1Y
1.16%
3Y*
2.04%
5Y*
-1.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGVC.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XGVC.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF
0.30%-4.28%1.61%2.49%-5.86%
VAGF.DE
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.68%3.23%0.82%4.53%-3.21%

Correlation

The correlation between XGVC.DE and VAGF.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2022

0.73

The correlation between XGVC.DE and VAGF.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGVC.DE vs. VAGF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGVC.DE
XGVC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
XGVC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGVC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGVC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
XGVC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGVC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

VAGF.DE
VAGF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
VAGF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGVC.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XGVC.DE) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (VAGF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGVC.DEVAGF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.06

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

0.38

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.95

1.06

-2.01

XGVC.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGVC.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the VAGF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGVC.DE and VAGF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGVC.DEVAGF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

0.33

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

-0.17

-0.07

Drawdowns

XGVC.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGVC.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.47%, smaller than the maximum VAGF.DE drawdown of -19.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGVC.DE and VAGF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGVC.DEVAGF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.47%

-19.57%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-3.11%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.10%

-4.45%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.39%

-10.73%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.81%

-8.99%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

1.13%

+0.29%

Volatility

XGVC.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XGVC.DE) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (VAGF.DE) have volatilities of 1.54% and 1.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGVC.DEVAGF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

1.55%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.05%

2.98%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00%

3.63%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.22%

4.90%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.22%

4.71%

+1.51%

XGVC.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGVC.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VAGF.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XGVC.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XGVC.DE nor VAGF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XGVC.DE and VAGF.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VAGF.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAGF.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XGVC.DE.

XGVC.DE tracks FTSE ESG Select World Government Bond Developed Markets, while VAGF.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted and Scaled (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XGVC.DE and 0.10% for VAGF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGVC.DE and VAGF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer