SPFV.DE vs. HGGA.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (SPFV.DE) and HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE).
SPFV.DE and HGGA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPFV.DE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (USD Hedged). It was launched on Oct 9, 2019. HGGA.DE is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 1-3 SRI Carbon ESG-Weighted. It was launched on Dec 13, 2021. Both SPFV.DE and HGGA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SPFV.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPFV.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPFV.DE SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) | 0.02% | 4.94% | 3.07% | 6.63% | -10.07% |
HGGA.DE HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF | -0.38% | 8.18% | -0.35% | 3.32% | -7.28% |
Different Trading Currencies
SPFV.DE is traded in USD, while HGGA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the HGGA.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPFV.DE achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly higher than HGGA.DE's -0.38% return.
SPFV.DE
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 3.41%
- 3Y*
- 3.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.61%
- 10Y*
- —
HGGA.DE
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- -0.25%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 3.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPFV.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPFV.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than HGGA.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SPFV.DE vs. HGGA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SPFV.DE
HGGA.DE
SPFV.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (SPFV.DE) and HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPFV.DE | HGGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 0.85 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 1.33 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.17 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 1.78 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 4.82 | +0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPFV.DE | HGGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 0.85 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.12 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPFV.DE and HGGA.DE is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SPFV.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPFV.DE nor HGGA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SPFV.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPFV.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.26%, which is greater than HGGA.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFV.DE and HGGA.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPFV.DE | HGGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.26% | -8.58% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.35% | -4.12% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -4.87% | +3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.71% | -4.15% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 2.73% | -2.03% |
Volatility
SPFV.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (SPFV.DE) is 1.25%, while HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE) has a volatility of 1.92%. This indicates that SPFV.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HGGA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPFV.DE | HGGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 1.92% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.88% | 2.98% | -1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.25% | 5.34% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.21% | 5.62% | -1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.04% | 5.62% | -1.58% |